Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringHavering-atte-Bower wardY0011.26
Planning application · Havering

Y0011.26.

24 Merlin Road Romford RM5 3YA

Householder at 24 Merlin Road Romford RM5 3YA, received 19 Jan 2026 — refused on 23 Feb 2026 (delegated, Panyun Chow).

HaveringHavering-atte-BowerRM5 3YAY0011.26
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Feb 2026
5 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
5
Documents
5 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension with an overall depth of 6.00m, a maximum height of 3.15m, and an eaves height of 3.00m. (PRIOR APPROVAL)

Reference
Y0011.26
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM5 3YA
Council
Received
19 Jan 2026
Target date
2 Mar 2026
Decision date
23 Feb 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Pr App Refused Conditions/Reasons
Reference
Y0011.26
Type
Householder
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM5 3YA
Council
Received
19 Jan 2026
Target date
2 Mar 2026
Decision date
23 Feb 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Pr App Refused Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Application Form
Drawing
Drawing
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Application Form
Show all 5 rows
Drawing
Drawing

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 23 Feb 2026, delegated decision by Panyun Chow — 5 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Jan 2026
Application received
2 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
23 Feb 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Panyun Chow
19 Jan 2026
Application received
2 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
23 Feb 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Panyun Chow

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.