Planning Atlas
AtlasHillingdonOfficersPeter Morgan
Case officer · Hillingdon Planning

Peter Morgan.

Last recorded decision Mar 2016 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Hillingdon with an approval rate of 64% across 176 decided planning applications, spanning 20 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer176 decisions64% approval
Wards shaded by approval rate · click one to open it
Showing
All years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
176
Applications
2015–16
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 79%63%201565%2016
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate64% · 239th of 271
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Peter Morgan's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies this officer cites most across their decisions — how often each appears, and whether refusals citing it survive appeal.

In development — policy citations are coded from officer reports, and that parsing hasn't run for Hillingdon yet. Nothing is shown until it is real.

Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2015–16.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
71641/APP/2016/699
Planning Application
Approved
2016-07-06
5313/APP/2016/260
Planning Application
Approved
2016-06-09
71641/APP/2016/699
Planning Application
Approved
2016-07-06
5313/APP/2016/260
Planning Application
Approved
2016-06-09
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 176 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. TECON Ltd
2. The Planning Service P.O. Box
3. Mr Kaleem Janjua MCS DESIGN ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
4. Mr Kaleem Janjua M C S DESIGN Architectural Services
At a glance
OfficerPeter Morgan
BoroughHillingdon
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications176 (2015–16)
Approval rate64%
London approval avg79%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2015–16. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hillingdon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.