Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethBishops wardSE1 7XA02/02415/FUL
Planning application · Lambeth

02/02415/FUL.

100 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7XA

Full / Other Planning at 100 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7XA, received 14 Aug 2002 — refused on 23 Jul 2003 (delegated, Julie-Ann Bowker).

LambethBishopsSE1 7XA02/02415/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Jul 2003
49 wks
Decision time
41 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Amendment to planning permission 98/01097/FUL for the residential redevelopment of the site, dated 9/12/1998, in respect to the installation of external illumination to buildings A and B [Retrospective application].

Reference
02/02415/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
14 Aug 2002
Target date
9 Oct 2002
Decision date
23 Jul 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
02/02415/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
14 Aug 2002
Target date
9 Oct 2002
Decision date
23 Jul 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 23 Jul 2003, delegated decision by Julie-Ann Bowker — 49 weeks from submission (41 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
14 Aug 2002
Application received
9 Oct 2002
Statutory target date
23 Jul 2003
Delegated decision: Refused · Julie-Ann Bowker
14 Aug 2002
Application received
9 Oct 2002
Statutory target date
23 Jul 2003
Delegated decision: Refused · Julie-Ann Bowker

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.