Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethThurlow Park wardSE27 0AQBusiness 3-10 Penrith Place London SE27 0AQ02/03480/FUL
Planning application · Lambeth

02/03480/FUL.

Business 3-10 Penrith Place London SE27 0AQ

Full / Other Planning at Business 3-10 Penrith Place London SE27 0AQ, received 13 Dec 2002 — refused on 16 May 2003.

LambethThurlow ParkSE27 0AQ02/03480/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 May 2003
22 wks
Decision time
14 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey extension at first floor level, to unit 4, toward the northern corner of the site.

Reference
02/03480/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Council
Received
13 Dec 2002
Target date
7 Feb 2003
Decision date
16 May 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
02/03480/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Council
Received
13 Dec 2002
Target date
7 Feb 2003
Decision date
16 May 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
3 10 Penrith Place London SE27 0AQ
13 Dec 2002
3 10 Penrith Place London SE27 0AQ
13 Dec 2002

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 16 May 2003 — 22 weeks from submission (14 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Dec 2002
Application received
7 Feb 2003
Statutory target date
16 May 2003
Delegated decision: Refused
13 Dec 2002
Application received
7 Feb 2003
Statutory target date
16 May 2003
Delegated decision: Refused

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.