Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Lambeth›…Larkhall wardSW8 2JSThe New Portland Arms Public House 256 Wandsworth Road London SW8 2JS›06/02027/ADV
Planning application · Lambeth

06/02027/ADV.

The New Portland Arms Public House 256 Wandsworth Road London SW8 2JS

Advertisement at The New Portland Arms Public House 256 Wandsworth Road London SW8 2JS, received 21 Jun 2006 — refused on 11 Aug 2006 (delegated, Christopher Tickner).

Lambeth›Larkhall›SW8 2JS›06/02027/ADV
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 Aug 2006
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Display of an internally illluminated advertisement display poster at the side of property.

Reference
06/02027/ADV
Type
Advertisement Consent
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
21 Jun 2006
Target date
16 Aug 2006
Decision date
11 Aug 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
06/02027/ADV
Type
Advertisement Consent
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
21 Jun 2006
Target date
16 Aug 2006
Decision date
11 Aug 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Delegated Register
6 Oct 2016
Decision Notice
11 Aug 2006
Perspective Sketch, Specification Drawing & Site Location Pl
21 Jun 2006
OS Map
21 Jun 2006
Delegated Register
6 Oct 2016
Decision Notice
11 Aug 2006
Perspective Sketch, Specification Drawing & Site Location Pl
21 Jun 2006
Show all 4 rows
OS Map
21 Jun 2006

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 11 Aug 2006, delegated decision by Christopher Tickner — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Jun 2006
Application received
16 Aug 2006
Statutory target date
11 Aug 2006
Delegated decision: Refused · Christopher Tickner
Appeal
Decided · Appeal Dismissed
21 Jun 2006
Application received
16 Aug 2006
Statutory target date
11 Aug 2006
Delegated decision: Refused · Christopher Tickner
Show all 4 rows
Appeal
Decided · Appeal Dismissed

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.