Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethTulse Hill wardSW2 2SG33 Upper Tulse Hill London SW2 2SG06/04303/LDCE
Planning application · Lambeth

06/04303/LDCE.

33 Upper Tulse Hill London SW2 2SG

Lawful Development Certificate at 33 Upper Tulse Hill London SW2 2SG, received 19 Dec 2006 — refused on 13 Feb 2007 (delegated, Gavin Chinniah).

LambethTulse HillSW2 2SG06/04303/LDCE
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 Feb 2007
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Application for a Certificate of Lawfulness (Existing) with respect to the continued use of the first and second floor as a self contained flat.

Reference
06/04303/LDCE
Type
Certificate of Lawful Use existing
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
19 Dec 2006
Target date
13 Feb 2007
Decision date
13 Feb 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
06/04303/LDCE
Type
Certificate of Lawful Use existing
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
19 Dec 2006
Target date
13 Feb 2007
Decision date
13 Feb 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
13 Feb 2007
Decision Notice
13 Feb 2007

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 13 Feb 2007, delegated decision by Gavin Chinniah — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Dec 2006
Application received
13 Feb 2007
Statutory target date
13 Feb 2007
Delegated decision: Refused · Gavin Chinniah
19 Dec 2006
Application received
13 Feb 2007
Statutory target date
13 Feb 2007
Delegated decision: Refused · Gavin Chinniah

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.