Planning application · Lambeth
07/02492/RG3.
Flats 1 To 95 Teversham Lane London SW8 2DJ
Other at Flats 1 To 95 Teversham Lane London SW8 2DJ, received 28 Jun 2007 — approved on 27 Jul 2007.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Approved
Outcome
27 Jul 2007
4 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Replacement of existing windows with aluminium framed double glazed windows.
Reference
07/02492/RG3
Type
Approval under Reg 3 Councils own dev
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
28 Jun 2007
Target date
23 Aug 2007
Decision date
27 Jul 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
07/02492/RG3
Type
Approval under Reg 3 Councils own dev
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
28 Jun 2007
Target date
23 Aug 2007
Decision date
27 Jul 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 27 Jul 2007 — 4 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
28 Jun 2007
Application received
23 Aug 2007
Statutory target date
27 Jul 2007
Delegated decision: Approved
28 Jun 2007
Application received
23 Aug 2007
Statutory target date
27 Jul 2007
Delegated decision: Approved
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.