Planning application · Lambeth
08/04529/FUL.
164 Norwood Road London SE27 9AZ
Full / Other Planning at 164 Norwood Road London SE27 9AZ, received 28 Nov 2008 — refused on 9 Mar 2009.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
9 Mar 2009
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Retention of ATM and CCTV camera to the front elevation.
Reference
08/04529/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
28 Nov 2008
Validated
12 Jan 2009
Target date
9 Mar 2009
Decision date
9 Mar 2009
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
08/04529/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
28 Nov 2008
Validated
12 Jan 2009
Target date
9 Mar 2009
Decision date
9 Mar 2009
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 9 Mar 2009 — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
28 Nov 2008
Application received
12 Jan 2009
Application validated
9 Mar 2009
Statutory target date
9 Mar 2009
Delegated decision: Refused
28 Nov 2008
Application received
12 Jan 2009
Application validated
9 Mar 2009
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
9 Mar 2009
Delegated decision: Refused
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.