Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethKnights Hill ward16/01650/OUT
Planning application · Lambeth

16/01650/OUT.

West Norwood Lawn Tennis Club 128 Knight's Hill London SE27 0SR

Full / Other Planning at West Norwood Lawn Tennis Club 128 Knight's Hill London SE27 0SR, received 15 Mar 2016 — approved on 12 Jan 2018 by committee.

LambethKnights HillSE27 0SR16/01650/OUT
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Approved
Outcome
12 Jan 2018
95 wks
Decision time
87 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
31
Documents
31 linked
142
Objections
1 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Outline application for the erection of new mixed use part 4, part 5 storey building to provide replacement tennis club with two floodlit tennis courts, two indoor squash courts and club facilities on ground floor and basement, including ancillary caf� and hall, with 32 market and affordable (14x 1bed, 12x 2bed and 6x 3bed) dwellings (following demolition of existing tennis club buildings). All matters reserved except access. The proposed development does not accord with the provisions of the development plan in force in the area in which the land to which the application relates is situated. The proposed development is a departure from Policy EN1 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015).

Reference
16/01650/OUT
Type
Outline Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE27 0SR
Council
Received
15 Mar 2016
Validated
23 Mar 2016
Target date
12 Jan 2018
Decision date
12 Jan 2018
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Reference
16/01650/OUT
Type
Outline Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE27 0SR
Council
Received
15 Mar 2016
Validated
23 Mar 2016
Target date
12 Jan 2018
Decision date
12 Jan 2018
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Section 106
12 Jan 2018
COMMITTEE REPORT
12 Jan 2018
PEOUTZ TEMPLATE (PH)
12 Jan 2018
SITE NOTICE 2 05/05/2017
5 May 2017
SITE NOTICE 05/05/2017
5 May 2017
SUPPLEMENTARY TRANSPORT STATEMENT APPENDIX
19 Apr 2017
SUPPLEMENTARY TRANSPORT STATEMENT
19 Apr 2017
LETTER FROM APPLICANT RE: PARKING SURVEY
13 Feb 2017
REVISED VIABILITY STATEMENT
9 Feb 2017
LIGHTING PLAN
8 Feb 2017
Section 106
12 Jan 2018
COMMITTEE REPORT
12 Jan 2018
PEOUTZ TEMPLATE (PH)
12 Jan 2018
Show all 10 rows
SITE NOTICE 2 05/05/2017
5 May 2017
SITE NOTICE 05/05/2017
5 May 2017
SUPPLEMENTARY TRANSPORT STATEMENT APPENDIX
19 Apr 2017
SUPPLEMENTARY TRANSPORT STATEMENT
19 Apr 2017
LETTER FROM APPLICANT RE: PARKING SURVEY
13 Feb 2017
REVISED VIABILITY STATEMENT
9 Feb 2017
LIGHTING PLAN
8 Feb 2017

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 12 Jan 2018, determined by the planning committee — 95 weeks from submission (87 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Mar 2016
Application received
23 Mar 2016
Application validated
12 Jan 2018
Statutory target date
12 Jan 2018
Committee decision: Approved
15 Mar 2016
Application received
23 Mar 2016
Application validated
12 Jan 2018
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
12 Jan 2018
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
142
In support
1
Total comments
144
Objections
142
In support
1
Total comments
144
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.