Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Lambeth›…Clapham Common wardSW4 9DL›17/00778/ADV
Planning application · Lambeth

17/00778/ADV.

The New Belvedere Hotel 90 Clapham Common South Side London SW4 9DL

Advertisement at The New Belvedere Hotel 90 Clapham Common South Side London SW4 9DL, received 17 Feb 2017 — refused on 19 Apr 2017 (delegated, Panyun Chow).

Lambeth›Clapham Common›SW4 9DL›17/00778/ADV
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
19 Apr 2017
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Display of 1 x non-illuminated hanging sign to the front elevation

Reference
17/00778/ADV
Type
Advertisement Consent
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
17 Feb 2017
Validated
24 Feb 2017
Target date
21 Apr 2017
Decision date
19 Apr 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
17/00778/ADV
Type
Advertisement Consent
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
17 Feb 2017
Validated
24 Feb 2017
Target date
21 Apr 2017
Decision date
19 Apr 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
19 Apr 2017
DELEGATED REGISTER
19 Apr 2017
NEW SIGNS AS PROPOSED
27 Feb 2017
SURVEYS AS EXISTING
27 Feb 2017
COVER LETTER
27 Feb 2017
2503/PL/2016/01C
23 Feb 2017
Consultation List
23 Feb 2017
2503/PL/2016/02A
23 Feb 2017
Decision Notice
19 Apr 2017
DELEGATED REGISTER
19 Apr 2017
NEW SIGNS AS PROPOSED
27 Feb 2017
Show all 8 rows
SURVEYS AS EXISTING
27 Feb 2017
COVER LETTER
27 Feb 2017
2503/PL/2016/01C
23 Feb 2017
Consultation List
23 Feb 2017
2503/PL/2016/02A
23 Feb 2017

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 19 Apr 2017, delegated decision by Panyun Chow — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
17 Feb 2017
Application received
24 Feb 2017
Application validated
21 Apr 2017
Statutory target date
19 Apr 2017
Delegated decision: Refused · Panyun Chow
17 Feb 2017
Application received
24 Feb 2017
Application validated
21 Apr 2017
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
19 Apr 2017
Delegated decision: Refused · Panyun Chow

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.