Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethWaterloo & South Bank ward20/03539/FUL
Planning application · Lambeth

20/03539/FUL.

79-87 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7HR

Full / Other Planning at 79-87 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7HR, received 13 Oct 2020 — refused on 25 Sep 2023 by committee.

LambethWaterloo & South BankSE1 7HR20/03539/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
25 Sep 2023
154 wks
Decision time
146 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
176
Documents
176 linked
17
Objections
2 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Allowed
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a ground plus 14-storey building (plus two basement levels) comprising gym (Class E) at basement level, retail (Class E) at ground floor, office (Class E) at first floor, light industrial (Class E) at second floor and hotel (C1) at part basement, ground and floors 3 to 14, with plant enclosure at roof level, and associated cycle parking, servicing, all necessary enabling works and associated highways improvements.

Reference
20/03539/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE1 7HR
Council
Received
13 Oct 2020
Target date
25 Sep 2023
Decision date
25 Sep 2023
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Reference
20/03539/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE1 7HR
Council
Received
13 Oct 2020
Target date
25 Sep 2023
Decision date
25 Sep 2023
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
PLAN 2 - GYM FACILITY
9 Jul 2025
SITE PLAN
9 Jul 2025
AGREED HEADS OF TERMS - 79-87 WESTMINSTER BRIDGE ROAD
9 Jul 2025
AGREED FORM S106 AGREEMENT (31.05.24) (CLEAN)
9 Jul 2025
CIL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
9 Jul 2025
PLAN 1 - GROUND FLOOR
9 Jul 2025
PROOF OF EVIDENCE JACK BENNETT SUMMARY
25 Jun 2025
PROOF OF EVIDENCE NATHAN BARRETT SUMMARY
25 Jun 2025
APPELLANT PROOF OF EVIDENCE ELLIE EVANS
25 Jun 2025
STATEMENT OF COMMON GROUND
25 Jun 2025
PLAN 2 - GYM FACILITY
9 Jul 2025
SITE PLAN
9 Jul 2025
AGREED HEADS OF TERMS - 79-87 WESTMINSTER BRIDGE ROAD
9 Jul 2025
Show all 10 rows
AGREED FORM S106 AGREEMENT (31.05.24) (CLEAN)
9 Jul 2025
CIL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
9 Jul 2025
PLAN 1 - GROUND FLOOR
9 Jul 2025
PROOF OF EVIDENCE JACK BENNETT SUMMARY
25 Jun 2025
PROOF OF EVIDENCE NATHAN BARRETT SUMMARY
25 Jun 2025
APPELLANT PROOF OF EVIDENCE ELLIE EVANS
25 Jun 2025
STATEMENT OF COMMON GROUND
25 Jun 2025

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 25 Sep 2023, determined by the planning committee — 154 weeks from submission (146 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Oct 2020
Application received
25 Sep 2023
Statutory target date
25 Sep 2023
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Allowed
13 Oct 2020
Application received
25 Sep 2023
Statutory target date
25 Sep 2023
Committee decision: Refused
Show all 4 rows
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Allowed

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed building, by virtue of its height, bulk, massing and siting, would be a discordant addition to the townscape that would be harmful to the prevailing local character, and would cause a moderate level of less than substantial harm to the significance and special interest of the Grade II listed Lincoln Tower. It has not been clearly and convincingly demonstrated that there are public benefits that would outweigh the harm caused to the townscape or heritage asset. This would be contrary to: London Plan 2021 policies HC1 (Heritage conservation and growth) and D9 (Tall buildings); and Lambeth Local Plan 2021 policies Q7 (Urban design: new development), Q20 (Statutory listed buildings), and Q26 (Tall buildings); and the aims and objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework including the test specified at paragraph 202.
2
The proposed hotel use, would by virtue of its location, nature and scale, cause unacceptable harm to the balance and mix of local land uses. This would be contrary to Lambeth Local Plan 2021 policy ED14 (Hotels and other visitor accommodation).
1
The proposed building, by virtue of its height, bulk, massing and siting, would be a discordant addition to the townscape that would be harmful to the prevailing local character, and would cause a moderate level of less than substantial harm to the significance and special interest of the Grade II listed Lincoln Tower. It has not been clearly and convincingly demonstrated that there are public benefits that would outweigh the harm caused to the townscape or heritage asset. This would be contrary to: London Plan 2021 policies HC1 (Heritage conservation and growth) and D9 (Tall buildings); and Lambeth Local Plan 2021 policies Q7 (Urban design: new development), Q20 (Statutory listed buildings), and Q26 (Tall buildings); and the aims and objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework including the test specified at paragraph 202.
2
The proposed hotel use, would by virtue of its location, nature and scale, cause unacceptable harm to the balance and mix of local land uses. This would be contrary to Lambeth Local Plan 2021 policy ED14 (Hotels and other visitor accommodation).
Policies cited
NPPF para 202

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Allowed
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Allowed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
17
In support
2
Total comments
20
Objections
17
In support
2
Total comments
20
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.