Planning application · Lambeth
21/00245/FUL.
2 Fairview Place London SW2 2SL
Full / Other Planning at 2 Fairview Place London SW2 2SL, received 21 Jan 2021 — refused on 17 Jun 2021 (delegated, Panyun Chow).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Jun 2021
21 wks
Decision time
13 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a part first floor, part second floor extension to provide 3 additional residential units (2 x 1-bedroom flats and 1 x 3-bedroom flat), together with the installation of 2 windows to the ground floor (Flat B), and the provision of refuse and cycle storage and installation of external stair.
Reference
21/00245/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
21 Jan 2021
Validated
22 Apr 2021
Target date
17 Jun 2021
Decision date
17 Jun 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
21/00245/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
21 Jan 2021
Validated
22 Apr 2021
Target date
17 Jun 2021
Decision date
17 Jun 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 17 Jun 2021, delegated decision by Panyun Chow — 21 weeks from submission (13 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
21 Jan 2021
Application received
22 Apr 2021
Application validated
17 Jun 2021
Statutory target date
17 Jun 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Panyun Chow
21 Jan 2021
Application received
22 Apr 2021
Application validated
17 Jun 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 Jun 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Panyun Chow
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The application fails to demonstrate that the maximum reasonable contribution towards off site affordable
housing provision would be forthcoming and in the absence of any legal agreement to secure an appropriate
contribution in lieu of on-site affordable housing provision, the proposal would fail to provide the maximum
reasonable contribution towards affordable housing. As such, it is contrary to Policies D4 and H2 of the Lambeth
Local Plan (2015) and Policies D4 and H2 of the Draft Revised Lambeth Local Plan (2020).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
2
The proposed residential flats E and F at second floor level would not meet the overall minimum space
standards, resulting in substandard residential accommodation which would be to the detriment of the amenities of
future residents. The proposal is therefore considered to be contrary to Policies H5 and Q2 of the Lambeth Local
Plan (2015), Policies H5 and Q2 of the Draft Revised Lambeth Local Plan (2020) and Policy D6 of the London Plan
(2021), and the Technical housing standards - nationally described space standard (2015).
3
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or a section 106 agreement securing appropriate mitigation by
restricting future occupiers of the development from obtaining parking permits within the Controlled Parking Zone,
and providing car club and cycle hire memberships, the proposed development would likely exacerbate existing
parking stress and congestion on the surrounding highway network. The application is therefore contrary to
Policies D4, T1, T6 and T7 of Lambeth's Local Plan (2015) and policies D4, T1 and T7 of the Draft Revised
Lambeth Local Plan (2020).
1
The application fails to demonstrate that the maximum reasonable contribution towards off site affordable
housing provision would be forthcoming and in the absence of any legal agreement to secure an appropriate
contribution in lieu of on-site affordable housing provision, the proposal would fail to provide the maximum
reasonable contribution towards affordable housing. As such, it is contrary to Policies D4 and H2 of the Lambeth
Local Plan (2015) and Policies D4 and H2 of the Draft Revised Lambeth Local Plan (2020).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
2
The proposed residential flats E and F at second floor level would not meet the overall minimum space
standards, resulting in substandard residential accommodation which would be to the detriment of the amenities of
future residents. The proposal is therefore considered to be contrary to Policies H5 and Q2 of the Lambeth Local
Plan (2015), Policies H5 and Q2 of the Draft Revised Lambeth Local Plan (2020) and Policy D6 of the London Plan
(2021), and the Technical housing standards - nationally described space standard (2015).
3
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or a section 106 agreement securing appropriate mitigation by
restricting future occupiers of the development from obtaining parking permits within the Controlled Parking Zone,
and providing car club and cycle hire memberships, the proposed development would likely exacerbate existing
parking stress and congestion on the surrounding highway network. The application is therefore contrary to
Policies D4, T1, T6 and T7 of Lambeth's Local Plan (2015) and policies D4, T1 and T7 of the Draft Revised
Lambeth Local Plan (2020).
Policies cited
D4H2H5Q2D6T1T6T7
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.