Planning application · Lambeth
21/03631/FUL.
222 Railton Road London SE24 0JT
Full / Other Planning at 222 Railton Road London SE24 0JT, received 26 Aug 2021 — refused on 18 Oct 2021 (delegated, Maylinne Nasa).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 Oct 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
1
Objections
2 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a single storey rear extension at first floor level; erection of a mansard roof extension including rear dormer windows and 4 roof lights.
Reference
21/03631/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE24 0JT
Ward
Council
Received
26 Aug 2021
Target date
21 Oct 2021
Decision date
18 Oct 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
21/03631/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE24 0JT
Ward
Council
Received
26 Aug 2021
Target date
21 Oct 2021
Decision date
18 Oct 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 18 Oct 2021, delegated decision by Maylinne Nasa — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
26 Aug 2021
Application received
21 Oct 2021
Statutory target date
18 Oct 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Maylinne Nasa
26 Aug 2021
Application received
21 Oct 2021
Statutory target date
18 Oct 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Maylinne Nasa
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first floor rear extension, which would be located adjacent to the existing two storey rear
extension of the host building, would result in an incongruous and uncharacteristic addition at this level. The
combined scale of both extensions would be out of keeping with the architectural character of the host property and
rest of the terrace of which in forms a part, in particular and the local area, in general. As such the proposal is
contrary to Policies Q5 and Q11 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
2
Insufficient information was submitted with regards to the proposed relocation of the external duct to
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
ensure that no negative impacts for occupiers of the application site and the nearing property at No. 220 Railton
Road in accordance with the requirements of Policy Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
1
The proposed first floor rear extension, which would be located adjacent to the existing two storey rear
extension of the host building, would result in an incongruous and uncharacteristic addition at this level. The
combined scale of both extensions would be out of keeping with the architectural character of the host property and
rest of the terrace of which in forms a part, in particular and the local area, in general. As such the proposal is
contrary to Policies Q5 and Q11 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
2
Insufficient information was submitted with regards to the proposed relocation of the external duct to
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
ensure that no negative impacts for occupiers of the application site and the nearing property at No. 220 Railton
Road in accordance with the requirements of Policy Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
Policies cited
Q5Q11Q2
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
2
Total comments
3
Objections
1
In support
2
Total comments
3
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.