Planning application · Lambeth
21/04096/FUL.
2 Chalford Road London SE21 8BX
Full / Other Planning at 2 Chalford Road London SE21 8BX, received 22 Oct 2021 — refused on 16 Dec 2021 (delegated, Ruth Brown).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Dec 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
1
Objections
2 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a single storey ground floor rear extension and new garden wall.
Reference
21/04096/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE21 8BX
Ward
Council
Received
22 Oct 2021
Target date
17 Dec 2021
Decision date
16 Dec 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
21/04096/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE21 8BX
Ward
Council
Received
22 Oct 2021
Target date
17 Dec 2021
Decision date
16 Dec 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 16 Dec 2021, delegated decision by Ruth Brown — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
22 Oct 2021
Application received
17 Dec 2021
Statutory target date
16 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Ruth Brown
22 Oct 2021
Application received
17 Dec 2021
Statutory target date
16 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Ruth Brown
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed extension by reason of its bulk, scale and siting, would not constitute a subordinate addition
to the host property and would fail to respond to the character and appearance of the host property and
surrounding terrace, the proposal is therefore contrary to the guidance set out in the adopted Building Alterations
and Extension Supplementary Planning Document (2015) and the objectives of policies Q5, and Q11 of the
Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (September 2021).
2
The proposals fail to respond to the context of the application site and represent an unneighbourly form of
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
development resulting in an increased sense of enclosure to 90 Clive Road, and insufficient information has been
submitted to enable a full assessment of the impact on sunlight and daylight contrary to the objectives of policy Q2
of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (September 2021).
1
The proposed extension by reason of its bulk, scale and siting, would not constitute a subordinate addition
to the host property and would fail to respond to the character and appearance of the host property and
surrounding terrace, the proposal is therefore contrary to the guidance set out in the adopted Building Alterations
and Extension Supplementary Planning Document (2015) and the objectives of policies Q5, and Q11 of the
Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (September 2021).
2
The proposals fail to respond to the context of the application site and represent an unneighbourly form of
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
development resulting in an increased sense of enclosure to 90 Clive Road, and insufficient information has been
submitted to enable a full assessment of the impact on sunlight and daylight contrary to the objectives of policy Q2
of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (September 2021).
Policies cited
Q11Q2
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
2
Total comments
3
Objections
1
In support
2
Total comments
3
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.