Planning application · Lambeth
22/01898/FUL.
1 Bon Marche Mews London Lambeth SE27 9BJ
Full / Other Planning at 1 Bon Marche Mews London Lambeth SE27 9BJ, received 24 May 2022 — refused on 19 Aug 2022 (delegated, Nadia Harper).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
19 Aug 2022
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Conversion of garage to habitable room.
Reference
22/01898/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE27 9BJ
Ward
Council
Received
24 May 2022
Target date
19 Jul 2022
Decision date
19 Aug 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
22/01898/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE27 9BJ
Ward
Council
Received
24 May 2022
Target date
19 Jul 2022
Decision date
19 Aug 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 19 Aug 2022, delegated decision by Nadia Harper — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
24 May 2022
Application received
19 Jul 2022
Statutory target date
19 Aug 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Nadia Harper
24 May 2022
Application received
19 Jul 2022
Statutory target date
19 Aug 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Nadia Harper
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed replacement garage doors with windows, by reason of its design would fail to positively
respond the host building or the surrounding area, therefore the proposal is contrary to policy Q5 and Q11 of the
Local Plan (2021) and the Supplementary Planning Document on Building Alterations and Extensions (2015).
2
In the context of the original decision (12/00657/FUL) allowing the loss of the garages would undermine
the purposes of condition 12 to enable vehicles to draw off, and park clear of the highway to minimise danger,
obstruction and inconvenience to users of the adjoining highway, contrary to policy T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan
(2021) and policy T6 the London Plan (2021).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
1
The proposed replacement garage doors with windows, by reason of its design would fail to positively
respond the host building or the surrounding area, therefore the proposal is contrary to policy Q5 and Q11 of the
Local Plan (2021) and the Supplementary Planning Document on Building Alterations and Extensions (2015).
2
In the context of the original decision (12/00657/FUL) allowing the loss of the garages would undermine
the purposes of condition 12 to enable vehicles to draw off, and park clear of the highway to minimise danger,
obstruction and inconvenience to users of the adjoining highway, contrary to policy T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan
(2021) and policy T6 the London Plan (2021).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
Policies cited
Q5Q11T6
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.