Planning application · Lambeth
22/01934/FUL.
34 Aquinas Street London SE1 8AD
Full / Other Planning at 34 Aquinas Street London SE1 8AD, received 27 May 2022 — refused on 22 Jul 2022 (delegated, Michael Clawson).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
22 Jul 2022
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Installation of 10 flush rooflights to the rear elevations. (To second floor flat, 34C)
Reference
22/01934/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE1 8AD
Council
Received
27 May 2022
Target date
22 Jul 2022
Decision date
22 Jul 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
22/01934/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE1 8AD
Council
Received
27 May 2022
Target date
22 Jul 2022
Decision date
22 Jul 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 22 Jul 2022, delegated decision by Michael Clawson — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
27 May 2022
Application received
22 Jul 2022
Statutory target date
22 Jul 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Michael Clawson
27 May 2022
Application received
22 Jul 2022
Statutory target date
22 Jul 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Michael Clawson
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rooflights on the rear roof slopes, due to their excessive number, would appear
uncharacteristic and incongruous and would fail to respect and respond positively to the original architecture of the
host building and would fail to respond to the positive aspects of the local context and historic character in respect
of built form. This would result in "less than substantial harm" to the character and appearance of the Conservation
Area, which would not be outweighed by any public benefits. Consequently, the proposal is unacceptable when
assessed against policies Q5, Q11 and Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2020-2035) adopted September 2021 and
the Building Alterations and Extensions Supplementary Planning Document (2015).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
1
The proposed rooflights on the rear roof slopes, due to their excessive number, would appear
uncharacteristic and incongruous and would fail to respect and respond positively to the original architecture of the
host building and would fail to respond to the positive aspects of the local context and historic character in respect
of built form. This would result in "less than substantial harm" to the character and appearance of the Conservation
Area, which would not be outweighed by any public benefits. Consequently, the proposal is unacceptable when
assessed against policies Q5, Q11 and Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2020-2035) adopted September 2021 and
the Building Alterations and Extensions Supplementary Planning Document (2015).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
Policies cited
Q5Q11Q22
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.