Planning application · Lambeth
22/03355/FUL.
163 Gleneldon Mews London Lambeth SW16 2AZ
Full / Other Planning at 163 Gleneldon Mews London Lambeth SW16 2AZ, received 20 Sep 2022 — refused on 16 Jan 2023 (delegated, Michael Clawson).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Jan 2023
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of mansard roof extension at first floor level to provide a residential unit (Class C3). Retention of existing uses at ground floor level.
Reference
22/03355/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW16 2AZ
Council
Received
20 Sep 2022
Validated
14 Oct 2022
Target date
16 Jan 2023
Decision date
16 Jan 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
22/03355/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW16 2AZ
Council
Received
20 Sep 2022
Validated
14 Oct 2022
Target date
16 Jan 2023
Decision date
16 Jan 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 16 Jan 2023, delegated decision by Michael Clawson — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
20 Sep 2022
Application received
14 Oct 2022
Application validated
16 Jan 2023
Statutory target date
16 Jan 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Michael Clawson
20 Sep 2022
Application received
14 Oct 2022
Application validated
16 Jan 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
16 Jan 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Michael Clawson
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed mansard roof extension by reason of its siting, scale, bulk, detailed design and use of
unsympathetic materials would result in an incongruous and obtrusive form of development. Consequently, the
proposal would be harmful to the established character and appearance of the host building and wider Streatham
High Road Conservation Area, contrary to policies Q5, Q11, and Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035
(2021).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
2
The proposal would fail to meet the Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) requirements in terms
of its GIA, private amenity space and in-built storage. The proposal would therefore provide a sub-standard level of
accommodation and a poor living environment for future occupants. The application is therefore contrary to Policy
D6 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies H5 and Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
3
The proposed access steps and door on the first-floor rear elevation of the proposal would result in a loss
of privacy to the occupiers of the adjoining property (No.163 Streatham High Road) and the amenity space to the
rear of the host building. The proposed development is therefore unacceptable in amenity terms and therefore fails
to comply with policy Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
4
The proposed development has not met the minimum requirement of 2 long-stay cycle parking spaces for
the residential unit, nor has any cycle parking details been provided outlining the location of any existing spaces.
As such, the proposal would fail to promote and ensure sustainable travel in line with the borough's aims, and
therefore would fail to comply with policy Q13 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
5
In the absence of a Section 106 Agreement to secure a contribution to any future CPZ (Controlled Parking
Zone), provision of a car club membership and cycle hire membership the transport impacts of the development
would not be fully addressed, and it would fail to promote less private car ownership and sustainable travel. The
application is therefore contrary to policies T1, T3 and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
1
The proposed mansard roof extension by reason of its siting, scale, bulk, detailed design and use of
unsympathetic materials would result in an incongruous and obtrusive form of development. Consequently, the
proposal would be harmful to the established character and appearance of the host building and wider Streatham
High Road Conservation Area, contrary to policies Q5, Q11, and Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035
(2021).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
2
The proposal would fail to meet the Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) requirements in terms
of its GIA, private amenity space and in-built storage. The proposal would therefore provide a sub-standard level of
accommodation and a poor living environment for future occupants. The application is therefore contrary to Policy
D6 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies H5 and Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
3
The proposed access steps and door on the first-floor rear elevation of the proposal would result in a loss
of privacy to the occupiers of the adjoining property (No.163 Streatham High Road) and the amenity space to the
rear of the host building. The proposed development is therefore unacceptable in amenity terms and therefore fails
to comply with policy Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
Show all 5 rows
4
The proposed development has not met the minimum requirement of 2 long-stay cycle parking spaces for
the residential unit, nor has any cycle parking details been provided outlining the location of any existing spaces.
As such, the proposal would fail to promote and ensure sustainable travel in line with the borough's aims, and
therefore would fail to comply with policy Q13 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
5
In the absence of a Section 106 Agreement to secure a contribution to any future CPZ (Controlled Parking
Zone), provision of a car club membership and cycle hire membership the transport impacts of the development
would not be fully addressed, and it would fail to promote less private car ownership and sustainable travel. The
application is therefore contrary to policies T1, T3 and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
Policies cited
Q22D6H5Q2Q13T1T3T6
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.