Planning application · Lambeth
22/03789/FUL.
237 Valley Road London Lambeth SW16 2AF
Full / Other Planning at 237 Valley Road London Lambeth SW16 2AF, received 24 Oct 2022 — refused on 15 Dec 2022 (delegated, Josh Parker).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
15 Dec 2022
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Retrospective application for the erection of a front fence and vehicular gate.
Reference
22/03789/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW16 2AF
Ward
Council
Received
24 Oct 2022
Target date
19 Dec 2022
Decision date
15 Dec 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
22/03789/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW16 2AF
Ward
Council
Received
24 Oct 2022
Target date
19 Dec 2022
Decision date
15 Dec 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 15 Dec 2022, delegated decision by Josh Parker — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
24 Oct 2022
Application received
19 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
15 Dec 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Josh Parker
24 Oct 2022
Application received
19 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
15 Dec 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Josh Parker
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The boundary treatment by reason of its stark and incongruous appearance is not characteristic of the
immediate locality, does not contribute to local distinctiveness and is detrimental to the character and appearance
of the property and the visual amenity of the streetscape. As such the application would conflict with policies Q2,
Q5 & Q15 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2025 (2021).
2
The boundary treatment would exceed 900mm in height and the application fails to demonstrate that it
would not harm pedestrian and vehicular sightlines, visibility and safety. As such the application would fail to
comply with policies Q15 and T2 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020 - 2035 (2021).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
1
The boundary treatment by reason of its stark and incongruous appearance is not characteristic of the
immediate locality, does not contribute to local distinctiveness and is detrimental to the character and appearance
of the property and the visual amenity of the streetscape. As such the application would conflict with policies Q2,
Q5 & Q15 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2025 (2021).
2
The boundary treatment would exceed 900mm in height and the application fails to demonstrate that it
would not harm pedestrian and vehicular sightlines, visibility and safety. As such the application would fail to
comply with policies Q15 and T2 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020 - 2035 (2021).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
Policies cited
Q2Q5Q15T2
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.