Planning application · Lambeth
22/04092/FUL.
30 Brixton Road London Lambeth SW9 6BU
Full / Other Planning at 30 Brixton Road London Lambeth SW9 6BU, received 17 Nov 2022 — refused on 20 Jan 2023 (delegated, Nadia Harper).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Jan 2023
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a ground floor single storey rear extension, together with the erection of a single storey outbuilding to the rear garden.
Reference
22/04092/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
17 Nov 2022
Target date
12 Jan 2023
Decision date
20 Jan 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
22/04092/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
17 Nov 2022
Target date
12 Jan 2023
Decision date
20 Jan 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 20 Jan 2023, delegated decision by Nadia Harper — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
17 Nov 2022
Application received
12 Jan 2023
Statutory target date
20 Jan 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Nadia Harper
17 Nov 2022
Application received
12 Jan 2023
Statutory target date
20 Jan 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Nadia Harper
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed outbuilding, by reason of its siting would fail to be set in by at least 1m from all site
boundaries and would also cumulatively with the proposed and existing extensions on site, fail to retain at least 50
per cent of the garden, therefore the proposal is contrary to policy Q14 of the Local Plan (2021) and the
Supplementary Planning Document on Building Alterations and Extensions (2015).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
2
The proposed rear extension, by virtue of its size and siting together with existing alterations would fail to
be a subordinate addition which positively responds to the design of the original building. Insufficient information
has been provided to demonstrate that there would not be an undue impact on the sunlight and daylight received
by neighbouring properties. Additionally, by virtue of the failure to retain 50% of the garden and the resulting
increase in built footprint the proposed development would result in an undue sense of enclosure for the adjoining
property contrary to policies Q2, Q5 and Q11 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
1
The proposed outbuilding, by reason of its siting would fail to be set in by at least 1m from all site
boundaries and would also cumulatively with the proposed and existing extensions on site, fail to retain at least 50
per cent of the garden, therefore the proposal is contrary to policy Q14 of the Local Plan (2021) and the
Supplementary Planning Document on Building Alterations and Extensions (2015).
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
2
The proposed rear extension, by virtue of its size and siting together with existing alterations would fail to
be a subordinate addition which positively responds to the design of the original building. Insufficient information
has been provided to demonstrate that there would not be an undue impact on the sunlight and daylight received
by neighbouring properties. Additionally, by virtue of the failure to retain 50% of the garden and the resulting
increase in built footprint the proposed development would result in an undue sense of enclosure for the adjoining
property contrary to policies Q2, Q5 and Q11 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
Policies cited
Q14Q2Q5Q11
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.