Planning application · Lambeth
22/04363/FUL.
30 Brixton Road London SW9 6BU
Full / Other Planning at 30 Brixton Road London SW9 6BU, received 9 Dec 2022 — refused on 10 Feb 2023 (delegated, Nadia Harper).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
10 Feb 2023
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Alteration to fenestration involving the replacement of first floor rear window with a door and erection of a roof terrace with balustrade.
Reference
22/04363/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
9 Dec 2022
Validated
19 Dec 2022
Target date
13 Feb 2023
Decision date
10 Feb 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
22/04363/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
9 Dec 2022
Validated
19 Dec 2022
Target date
13 Feb 2023
Decision date
10 Feb 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 10 Feb 2023, delegated decision by Nadia Harper — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
9 Dec 2022
Application received
19 Dec 2022
Application validated
13 Feb 2023
Statutory target date
10 Feb 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Nadia Harper
9 Dec 2022
Application received
19 Dec 2022
Application validated
13 Feb 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
10 Feb 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Nadia Harper
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed introduction of a roof terrace and associated works by reason of their design and form would
be uncharacteristic of the building type and detract from the established patterns amongst the terraces. The
proposal is therefore contrary to policies Q5 and Q11 of the Local Plan (2021) the Supplementary Planning
Document on Building Alterations and Extensions (2015).
2
The proposed roof terrace would result in an increase in actual and perceived overlooking to the
neighbouring occupiers and would result in increased noise and disturbance to neighbouring properties and would
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
therefore be detrimental to neighbouring amenity. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy Q2 of the Lambeth
Local Plan (2021).
1
The proposed introduction of a roof terrace and associated works by reason of their design and form would
be uncharacteristic of the building type and detract from the established patterns amongst the terraces. The
proposal is therefore contrary to policies Q5 and Q11 of the Local Plan (2021) the Supplementary Planning
Document on Building Alterations and Extensions (2015).
2
The proposed roof terrace would result in an increase in actual and perceived overlooking to the
neighbouring occupiers and would result in increased noise and disturbance to neighbouring properties and would
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
therefore be detrimental to neighbouring amenity. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy Q2 of the Lambeth
Local Plan (2021).
Policies cited
Q5Q11Q2
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.