Planning application · Lambeth
23/00519/FUL.
218 - 220�Stockwell Road London SW9 9SU
Full / Other Planning at 218 - 220�Stockwell Road London SW9 9SU, received 16 Feb 2023 — refused on 13 Apr 2023 (delegated, Camilla Bebb).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 Apr 2023
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a single storey dwelling house at the rear of properties, together with provision of refuse store and landscaping, plus the creation of a new entrance access door on Stockwell Avenue.
Reference
23/00519/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW9 9SU
Ward
Council
Received
16 Feb 2023
Target date
13 Apr 2023
Decision date
13 Apr 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
23/00519/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW9 9SU
Ward
Council
Received
16 Feb 2023
Target date
13 Apr 2023
Decision date
13 Apr 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 13 Apr 2023, delegated decision by Camilla Bebb — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
16 Feb 2023
Application received
13 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
13 Apr 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Camilla Bebb
16 Feb 2023
Application received
13 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
13 Apr 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Camilla Bebb
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal by reason of its location in the context of the surrounding trees (notably three TPO trees),
would result in poor quality outdoor amenity space for future occupants of the proposed dwelling, and in the
absence of a BRE compliant daylight and sunlight report to demonstrate otherwise, the proposed dwelling would
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
not have an acceptable standard of accommodation in terms of natural light levels within both the dwelling and the
outdoor amenity space. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies H5, Q2, Q7 and Q10 of the Lambeth Local
Plan (2021).
2
The proposed building, by reason of its detailed design and materials would constitute an incongruous
form of development that would be out of keeping with the surrounding area and does not result in a development
of high quality design. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8 and Q14 of the Lambeth Local
Plan (2021).
3
The proposed building by reason of its location and close proximity to the existing trees and vegetation on
site, would result in the immediate and long-term threat to the continued health and wellbeing of the existing trees
(notably three TPO trees) which are of amenity, ecological and biodiversity value and make a positive contribution
to the open, spatial, leafy and green character of the locality. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies Q9, Q10
and Q14 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and Policy G7 of the London Plan (2021).
4
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or other legal agreement securing appropriate mitigation by
restricting future occupiers of the development from obtaining parking permits within the Controlled Parking Zone,
providing car club and cycle hire membership, the proposed development would likely exacerbate existing parking
stress and congestion on the surrounding highway network. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies D4, T1
and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) Policy T6 of the London Plan (2021).
5
In the absence of a Fire Safety Statement, the applicant has failed to demonstrate compliance with Policy
D12 part A of the London Plan (2021).
1
The proposal by reason of its location in the context of the surrounding trees (notably three TPO trees),
would result in poor quality outdoor amenity space for future occupants of the proposed dwelling, and in the
absence of a BRE compliant daylight and sunlight report to demonstrate otherwise, the proposed dwelling would
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
not have an acceptable standard of accommodation in terms of natural light levels within both the dwelling and the
outdoor amenity space. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies H5, Q2, Q7 and Q10 of the Lambeth Local
Plan (2021).
2
The proposed building, by reason of its detailed design and materials would constitute an incongruous
form of development that would be out of keeping with the surrounding area and does not result in a development
of high quality design. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8 and Q14 of the Lambeth Local
Plan (2021).
3
The proposed building by reason of its location and close proximity to the existing trees and vegetation on
site, would result in the immediate and long-term threat to the continued health and wellbeing of the existing trees
(notably three TPO trees) which are of amenity, ecological and biodiversity value and make a positive contribution
to the open, spatial, leafy and green character of the locality. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies Q9, Q10
and Q14 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and Policy G7 of the London Plan (2021).
Show all 5 rows
4
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or other legal agreement securing appropriate mitigation by
restricting future occupiers of the development from obtaining parking permits within the Controlled Parking Zone,
providing car club and cycle hire membership, the proposed development would likely exacerbate existing parking
stress and congestion on the surrounding highway network. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies D4, T1
and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) Policy T6 of the London Plan (2021).
5
In the absence of a Fire Safety Statement, the applicant has failed to demonstrate compliance with Policy
D12 part A of the London Plan (2021).
Policies cited
H5Q2Q7Q10Q5Q6Q8Q14Q9G7D4T1T6
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.