Planning application · Lambeth
23/00667/FUL.
Full / Other Planning at 19 Gipsy Hill London SE19 1QG, received 17 Feb 2023 — refused on 16 May 2023 (delegated, Ruth Brown).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 May 2023
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
30
Documents
30 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Addition of a single dwelling on the second floor, along with a rear single dormer window, including 2 rooflights to the front and 1 to either side and demolition of a side garage and erection of a ground floor, single storey side extension.
Reference
23/00667/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE19 1QG
Ward
Council
Received
17 Feb 2023
Validated
21 Mar 2023
Target date
16 May 2023
Decision date
16 May 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
23/00667/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE19 1QG
Ward
Council
Received
17 Feb 2023
Validated
21 Mar 2023
Target date
16 May 2023
Decision date
16 May 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 16 May 2023, delegated decision by Ruth Brown — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
17 Feb 2023
Application received
21 Mar 2023
Application validated
16 May 2023
Statutory target date
16 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Ruth Brown
17 Feb 2023
Application received
21 Mar 2023
Application validated
16 May 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
16 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Ruth Brown
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development constitutes a sub-standard form of development by virtue of the insufficient
outlook, undersized residential units and in absence of a BRE compliant daylight and sunlight report to
demonstrate otherwise, the proposal would provide a sub-standard level of accommodation and a poor living
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
environment for future occupants, contrary to Policies Q2, H5 and H6 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
2
The proposed development would result in less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of
the surrounding Gipsy Hill Conservation Area and there is no identified public benefits to outweigh the harm, as
such the proposal is contrary to the objectives of policy Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and paragraph 196
of the NPPF (2021).
3
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or other legal agreement securing appropriate mitigation by
restricting future occupiers of the development from obtaining parking permits within the Controlled Parking Zone,
providing car club and cycle hire membership, the proposed development would likely exacerbate existing parking
stress and congestion on the surrounding highway network. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies D4, T1
and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) Policy T6 of the London Plan (2021).
1
The proposed development constitutes a sub-standard form of development by virtue of the insufficient
outlook, undersized residential units and in absence of a BRE compliant daylight and sunlight report to
demonstrate otherwise, the proposal would provide a sub-standard level of accommodation and a poor living
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
environment for future occupants, contrary to Policies Q2, H5 and H6 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
2
The proposed development would result in less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of
the surrounding Gipsy Hill Conservation Area and there is no identified public benefits to outweigh the harm, as
such the proposal is contrary to the objectives of policy Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and paragraph 196
of the NPPF (2021).
3
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or other legal agreement securing appropriate mitigation by
restricting future occupiers of the development from obtaining parking permits within the Controlled Parking Zone,
providing car club and cycle hire membership, the proposed development would likely exacerbate existing parking
stress and congestion on the surrounding highway network. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies D4, T1
and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) Policy T6 of the London Plan (2021).
Policies cited
Q2H5H6Q22NPPFD4T1T6
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.