Planning application · Lambeth
23/01101/FUL.
100 Hackford Road London SW9 0QU
Full / Other Planning at 100 Hackford Road London SW9 0QU, received 3 Apr 2023 — refused on 11 Jul 2023 (delegated, Scott Stevens).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 Jul 2023
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Change of use from Museum (Use Class F) to Commercial, Business and Service (Use Class E).
Reference
23/01101/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW9 0QU
Ward
Council
Received
3 Apr 2023
Target date
29 May 2023
Decision date
11 Jul 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
23/01101/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW9 0QU
Ward
Council
Received
3 Apr 2023
Target date
29 May 2023
Decision date
11 Jul 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 11 Jul 2023, delegated decision by Scott Stevens — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
3 Apr 2023
Application received
29 May 2023
Statutory target date
11 Jul 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Scott Stevens
3 Apr 2023
Application received
29 May 2023
Statutory target date
11 Jul 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Scott Stevens
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Insufficient information has been submitted regarding the nature of operation, neighbouring amenity,
transport, and sustainability. This prevents the Local Planning Authority to make a full and proper assessment of
the proposal against the National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, July 2021), The London Plan (GLA, March
2021), and the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021)).
2
The proposed Use Class E comprises uses that are not supported within a Key Industrial Business Area
(KIBA) or within the site's out-of-town centre location. The proposed development is therefore contrary to policies
E4, E5 and SD6, and ED3 and ED7 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2021.
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
3
In the absence of an enforceable mechanism to secure planning obligations required to mitigate the
impacts of this development, the proposal would fail to promote the up-take of sustainable modes of travel and
reduce dependence on the private car. The proposal would also fail to adequately support local employment. This
is contrary to the objectives of Policy T1, T3, T6 and ED15 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021) and
provisions of the NPPF (2021) which seek to promote sustainable modes of travel.
1
Insufficient information has been submitted regarding the nature of operation, neighbouring amenity,
transport, and sustainability. This prevents the Local Planning Authority to make a full and proper assessment of
the proposal against the National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, July 2021), The London Plan (GLA, March
2021), and the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021)).
2
The proposed Use Class E comprises uses that are not supported within a Key Industrial Business Area
(KIBA) or within the site's out-of-town centre location. The proposed development is therefore contrary to policies
E4, E5 and SD6, and ED3 and ED7 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2021.
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
3
In the absence of an enforceable mechanism to secure planning obligations required to mitigate the
impacts of this development, the proposal would fail to promote the up-take of sustainable modes of travel and
reduce dependence on the private car. The proposal would also fail to adequately support local employment. This
is contrary to the objectives of Policy T1, T3, T6 and ED15 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021) and
provisions of the NPPF (2021) which seek to promote sustainable modes of travel.
Policies cited
NPPFED3ED7T1T3T6ED15
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.