Planning application · Lambeth
23/01507/FUL.
3 Cowthorpe Road London Lambeth SW8 4RD
Full / Other Planning at 3 Cowthorpe Road London Lambeth SW8 4RD, received 9 May 2023 — refused on 9 Aug 2023 (delegated, Fiona Dyson).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
9 Aug 2023
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
4
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of ground floor single storey rear extension and part infill extension (Ground Floor Flat).
Reference
23/01507/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW8 4RD
Council
Received
9 May 2023
Target date
4 Jul 2023
Decision date
9 Aug 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
23/01507/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW8 4RD
Council
Received
9 May 2023
Target date
4 Jul 2023
Decision date
9 Aug 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 9 rows
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 9 Aug 2023, delegated decision by Fiona Dyson — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
9 May 2023
Application received
4 Jul 2023
Statutory target date
9 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Fiona Dyson
9 May 2023
Application received
4 Jul 2023
Statutory target date
9 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Fiona Dyson
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear extension by reason of its height and depth on the boundary would result in an
unacceptably increased sense of enclosure and impact on outlook to the detriment of the occupiers of the
neighbouring residential property at no.5 Cowthorpe Road. As such the proposal is contrary to the objectives of
policy Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
2
The proposed ground floor rear extension, by reason of its inappropriate design, bulk, and siting would
result in incongruous addition to the host building, which would unacceptably dominate the host building and would
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
detract from the appearance of the surrounding area. The application is contrary to Policies Q2, Q5, and Q11, of
the Lambeth Local Plan 2021, and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document on Building Alterations and
Extensions (2015).
1
The proposed rear extension by reason of its height and depth on the boundary would result in an
unacceptably increased sense of enclosure and impact on outlook to the detriment of the occupiers of the
neighbouring residential property at no.5 Cowthorpe Road. As such the proposal is contrary to the objectives of
policy Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
2
The proposed ground floor rear extension, by reason of its inappropriate design, bulk, and siting would
result in incongruous addition to the host building, which would unacceptably dominate the host building and would
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
detract from the appearance of the surrounding area. The application is contrary to Policies Q2, Q5, and Q11, of
the Lambeth Local Plan 2021, and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document on Building Alterations and
Extensions (2015).
Policies cited
Q2
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
4
In support
0
Total comments
4
Objections
4
In support
0
Total comments
4
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.