Planning application · Lambeth
23/02442/FUL.
50 Clapham High Street London SW4 7UL
Full / Other Planning at 50 Clapham High Street London SW4 7UL, received 1 Aug 2023 — refused on 18 Oct 2023 (delegated, Camilla Bebb).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 Oct 2023
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
18
Documents
18 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a single storey first floor front structural glass extension over access staircase
Reference
23/02442/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW4 7UL
Ward
Council
Received
1 Aug 2023
Validated
23 Aug 2023
Target date
18 Oct 2023
Decision date
18 Oct 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
23/02442/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW4 7UL
Ward
Council
Received
1 Aug 2023
Validated
23 Aug 2023
Target date
18 Oct 2023
Decision date
18 Oct 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 18 Oct 2023, delegated decision by Camilla Bebb — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
1 Aug 2023
Application received
23 Aug 2023
Application validated
18 Oct 2023
Statutory target date
18 Oct 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Camilla Bebb
1 Aug 2023
Application received
23 Aug 2023
Application validated
18 Oct 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
18 Oct 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Camilla Bebb
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed structural glass extension over the staircase due to its design, scale, form and elevated
position, would introduce an incongruous form of development that would as visual clutter to the roof and would
detract from the architectural integrity of the host building, terrace and street scene, and in so doing it would fail to
preserve the character and appearance of the Clapham High Street Conservation Area. The proposal would be
contrary to Policy Q2, Q5, Q8, Q11 and Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2021 and the National Planning Policy
Framework 2021. No public benefits have been provided to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
Clapham High Street Conservation Area contrary to Policy Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and the NPPF
(2023).
1
The proposed structural glass extension over the staircase due to its design, scale, form and elevated
position, would introduce an incongruous form of development that would as visual clutter to the roof and would
detract from the architectural integrity of the host building, terrace and street scene, and in so doing it would fail to
preserve the character and appearance of the Clapham High Street Conservation Area. The proposal would be
contrary to Policy Q2, Q5, Q8, Q11 and Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2021 and the National Planning Policy
Framework 2021. No public benefits have been provided to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171
Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk
SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk
REFULZ
Clapham High Street Conservation Area contrary to Policy Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and the NPPF
(2023).
Policies cited
Q2Q5Q8Q11Q22NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.