Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethMyatts Fields ward24/00673/LB
Planning application · Lambeth

24/00673/LB.

8 Russell Grove London Lambeth SW9 6HS

Listed Building at 8 Russell Grove London Lambeth SW9 6HS, received 29 Feb 2024 — refused on 13 May 2024 (delegated, Felicia Onabanjo).

LambethMyatts FieldsSW9 6HS24/00673/LB
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 May 2024
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
28
Documents
28 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Internal reconfiguration of the ground floor with kitchen to the front, including the removal of non-original internal partitions and chimney breast, installation of a glass sliding door between living room/kitchen and new door to staircase.

Reference
24/00673/LB
Type
Listed Building Consent
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW9 6HS
Council
Received
29 Feb 2024
Validated
21 Mar 2024
Target date
16 May 2024
Decision date
13 May 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
24/00673/LB
Type
Listed Building Consent
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW9 6HS
Council
Received
29 Feb 2024
Validated
21 Mar 2024
Target date
16 May 2024
Decision date
13 May 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
13 May 2024
OFFICER REPORT
10 May 2024
CIL FORM
2 Apr 2024
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
29 Feb 2024
EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN
29 Feb 2024
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN
29 Feb 2024
LOWER GROUND FLOOR PLAN DEMOLITION PLAN
29 Feb 2024
FIRST FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN
29 Feb 2024
EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION
29 Feb 2024
EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN
29 Feb 2024
Decision Notice
13 May 2024
OFFICER REPORT
10 May 2024
CIL FORM
2 Apr 2024
Show all 10 rows
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
29 Feb 2024
EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN
29 Feb 2024
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN
29 Feb 2024
LOWER GROUND FLOOR PLAN DEMOLITION PLAN
29 Feb 2024
FIRST FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN
29 Feb 2024
EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION
29 Feb 2024
EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN
29 Feb 2024

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 13 May 2024, delegated decision by Felicia Onabanjo — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
29 Feb 2024
Application received
21 Mar 2024
Application validated
16 May 2024
Statutory target date
13 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Felicia Onabanjo
29 Feb 2024
Application received
21 Mar 2024
Application validated
16 May 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
13 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Felicia Onabanjo

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed removal of an internal chimney breast and chimney piece at the upper ground floor would unacceptably erode the historic architectural features and the historic layout of the building thereby failing to preserve or enhance the special interest of this Grade II Listed Building. The proposal would result in a moderate degree of less than substantial harm but would delivers no public benefit to outweigh the harm identified. As such the proposal is contrary to Policy Q20 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and the National Planning Policy Framework (2023).
1
The proposed removal of an internal chimney breast and chimney piece at the upper ground floor would unacceptably erode the historic architectural features and the historic layout of the building thereby failing to preserve or enhance the special interest of this Grade II Listed Building. The proposal would result in a moderate degree of less than substantial harm but would delivers no public benefit to outweigh the harm identified. As such the proposal is contrary to Policy Q20 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and the National Planning Policy Framework (2023).
Policies cited
Q20NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.