Planning application · Lambeth
24/01452/FUL.
262 Brixton Hill London SW2 1HP
Full / Other Planning at 262 Brixton Hill London SW2 1HP, received 9 May 2024 — refused on 25 Jul 2024 (delegated, Michael Clawson).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
25 Jul 2024
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Change of use of the office (Use Class E(g)(i)) to the rear into a residential unit (Use Class C3).
Reference
24/01452/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW2 1HP
Ward
Council
Received
9 May 2024
Validated
30 May 2024
Target date
25 Jul 2024
Decision date
25 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
24/01452/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW2 1HP
Ward
Council
Received
9 May 2024
Validated
30 May 2024
Target date
25 Jul 2024
Decision date
25 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 25 Jul 2024, delegated decision by Michael Clawson — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
9 May 2024
Application received
30 May 2024
Application validated
25 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
25 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Michael Clawson
9 May 2024
Application received
30 May 2024
Application validated
25 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
25 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Michael Clawson
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal has failed to demonstrate lack of demand for office floorspace which would be lost without
replacement. This is contrary to the objective of employment generating floorspace within sustainable locations in
the borough. The proposal would not meet exceptions to the relevant policy and is contrary to Policy ED1(C) of the
Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
2
In the absence of a Section 106 Agreement to secure the development as car-permit free, provision of a
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk
London planning@lambeth.gov.uk
SW2 9QQ
REFULZ
car club membership and cycle hire membership the transport impacts of the development would not be fully
addressed, and it would fail to promote less private car ownership and sustainable travel. The application is
therefore contrary to Policies T1, T3 and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) 2020-2035.
1
The proposal has failed to demonstrate lack of demand for office floorspace which would be lost without
replacement. This is contrary to the objective of employment generating floorspace within sustainable locations in
the borough. The proposal would not meet exceptions to the relevant policy and is contrary to Policy ED1(C) of the
Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
2
In the absence of a Section 106 Agreement to secure the development as car-permit free, provision of a
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk
London planning@lambeth.gov.uk
SW2 9QQ
REFULZ
car club membership and cycle hire membership the transport impacts of the development would not be fully
addressed, and it would fail to promote less private car ownership and sustainable travel. The application is
therefore contrary to Policies T1, T3 and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) 2020-2035.
Policies cited
T1T3T6
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.