Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethOval ward24/01724/FUL
Planning application · Lambeth

24/01724/FUL.

Convent Of The Holy Family 35 - 36 Albert Square London SW8 1BZ

Full / Other Planning at Convent Of The Holy Family 35 - 36 Albert Square London SW8 1BZ, received 3 Jun 2024 — refused on 24 Jul 2024 (delegated, Ruth Smithson).

LambethOvalSW8 1BZ24/01724/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Jul 2024
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
22
Documents
22 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion of 35 Albert Square into 5 self-contained residential apartments. and retention of 36 Albert Square as a convent, together with associated external works to the rear of the property, replacement of two existing windows with doors, and installation of solar panels onto the flat roofs at the rear. (Please note: The reference number for this application for Full Planning Permission is 24/01724/FUL, but there is also an associated Listed Building Consent application related to these works with reference number: 24/01685/LB)

Reference
24/01724/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW8 1BZ
Ward
Council
Received
3 Jun 2024
Target date
29 Jul 2024
Decision date
24 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
24/01724/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW8 1BZ
Ward
Council
Received
3 Jun 2024
Target date
29 Jul 2024
Decision date
24 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
24 Jul 2024
OFFICER REPORT
23 Jul 2024
EXISTING SITE PLAN
3 Jun 2024
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
3 Jun 2024
EXISTING ELEVATIONS 3 OF 3
3 Jun 2024
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS & FIRE STRATEGY-2
3 Jun 2024
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS & FIRE STRATEGY-1
3 Jun 2024
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
3 Jun 2024
THE LOCATION PLAN
3 Jun 2024
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 3 OF 3
3 Jun 2024
Decision Notice
24 Jul 2024
OFFICER REPORT
23 Jul 2024
EXISTING SITE PLAN
3 Jun 2024
Show all 10 rows
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
3 Jun 2024
EXISTING ELEVATIONS 3 OF 3
3 Jun 2024
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS & FIRE STRATEGY-2
3 Jun 2024
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS & FIRE STRATEGY-1
3 Jun 2024
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
3 Jun 2024
THE LOCATION PLAN
3 Jun 2024
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 3 OF 3
3 Jun 2024

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 24 Jul 2024, delegated decision by Ruth Smithson — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Jun 2024
Application received
29 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
24 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Ruth Smithson
3 Jun 2024
Application received
29 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
24 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Ruth Smithson

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal would fail to meet the Nationally Described Space Standards in respect of floorspace and storage space. All flats would not benefit from a sufficient quantum or quality of amenity space or additional compensatory internal living space. The basement flat would have compromised outlook and privacy. As such the proposals would provide poor quality accommodation and fail to comply with Policies H5 and Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020- 2035 (2021) and Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021).
2
Insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed flats would benefit from adequate levels of daylight and sunlight to accord with the objectives of policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and policies Q2 and H5 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
3
In the absence of detailed plans showing the provision for cycle parking, it has not been demonstrated that the total number of long and short stay cycle spaces would be conveniently located to aid manoeuvrability for cyclists and step-free in a safe and covered store for the future occupants and visitors as required by the London Cycle Design Standards. The proposal would therefore be contrary to Policy Q13 and T3 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and Policy T5 of the London Plan (2021).
4
In the absence of a legal agreement to secure the development as car-permit free, provision of a car club membership and cycle hire membership the transport impacts of the development would not be fully addressed, and it would fail to promote less private car ownership and sustainable travel. The application is therefore contrary to Policies T1, T3 and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
1
The proposal would fail to meet the Nationally Described Space Standards in respect of floorspace and storage space. All flats would not benefit from a sufficient quantum or quality of amenity space or additional compensatory internal living space. The basement flat would have compromised outlook and privacy. As such the proposals would provide poor quality accommodation and fail to comply with Policies H5 and Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020- 2035 (2021) and Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021).
2
Insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed flats would benefit from adequate levels of daylight and sunlight to accord with the objectives of policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and policies Q2 and H5 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
3
In the absence of detailed plans showing the provision for cycle parking, it has not been demonstrated that the total number of long and short stay cycle spaces would be conveniently located to aid manoeuvrability for cyclists and step-free in a safe and covered store for the future occupants and visitors as required by the London Cycle Design Standards. The proposal would therefore be contrary to Policy Q13 and T3 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and Policy T5 of the London Plan (2021).
Show all 4 rows
4
In the absence of a legal agreement to secure the development as car-permit free, provision of a car club membership and cycle hire membership the transport impacts of the development would not be fully addressed, and it would fail to promote less private car ownership and sustainable travel. The application is therefore contrary to Policies T1, T3 and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
Policies cited
H5Q2D6Q13T3T5T1T6

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
7
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
7
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.