Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethKennington ward24/02098/FUL
Planning application · Lambeth

24/02098/FUL.

37 Courtenay Street London SE11 5PH

Full / Other Planning at 37 Courtenay Street London SE11 5PH, received 4 Jul 2024 — refused on 27 Sep 2024 (delegated, Nadia Harper).

LambethKenningtonSE11 5PH24/02098/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 Sep 2024
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Replacement of all existing windows with double glazed uPVC windows.

Reference
24/02098/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE11 5PH
Council
Received
4 Jul 2024
Validated
6 Aug 2024
Target date
1 Oct 2024
Decision date
27 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
24/02098/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE11 5PH
Council
Received
4 Jul 2024
Validated
6 Aug 2024
Target date
1 Oct 2024
Decision date
27 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Site Notice
27 Sept 2024
Decision Notice
27 Sept 2024
OFFICER REPORT
26 Sept 2024
Site Notice
22 Aug 2024
WINDOWS DETAILS
12 Aug 2024
THE LOCATION PLAN
4 Jul 2024
PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION
4 Jul 2024
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
4 Jul 2024
EXISTING SIDE ELEVATION
4 Jul 2024
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION
4 Jul 2024
Site Notice
27 Sept 2024
Decision Notice
27 Sept 2024
OFFICER REPORT
26 Sept 2024
Show all 10 rows
Site Notice
22 Aug 2024
WINDOWS DETAILS
12 Aug 2024
THE LOCATION PLAN
4 Jul 2024
PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION
4 Jul 2024
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
4 Jul 2024
EXISTING SIDE ELEVATION
4 Jul 2024
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION
4 Jul 2024

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 27 Sep 2024, delegated decision by Nadia Harper — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
4 Jul 2024
Application received
6 Aug 2024
Application validated
1 Oct 2024
Statutory target date
27 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Nadia Harper
4 Jul 2024
Application received
6 Aug 2024
Application validated
1 Oct 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Nadia Harper

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The replacement UPVC windows by reason of their material would be uncharacteristic of the building type and detract from the established pattern along the wider terrace resulting in less than substantial harm. In addition, insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the design of the existing windows would be authentically reproduced. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies Q5, Q11 and Q22 of the Local Plan (2021) and the Supplementary Planning Document on Lambeth Design Guide (2023) and fails to accord with paragraph 208 of the NPPF Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk London planning@lambeth.gov.uk SW2 9QQ REFULZ
1
The replacement UPVC windows by reason of their material would be uncharacteristic of the building type and detract from the established pattern along the wider terrace resulting in less than substantial harm. In addition, insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the design of the existing windows would be authentically reproduced. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies Q5, Q11 and Q22 of the Local Plan (2021) and the Supplementary Planning Document on Lambeth Design Guide (2023) and fails to accord with paragraph 208 of the NPPF Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk London planning@lambeth.gov.uk SW2 9QQ REFULZ
Policies cited
Q5Q11Q22NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.