Planning application · Lambeth
25/03875/FUL.
Pavement Adjacent Stockwell Skate Park Stockwell Road London SW9 0XZ
Full / Other Planning at Pavement Adjacent Stockwell Skate Park Stockwell Road London SW9 0XZ, received 15 Dec 2025 — refused on 12 Mar 2026 (delegated, Paul Curtis).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Mar 2026
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal lodged
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Installation of a new Street Hub unit, including the display of two internally illuminated digital LCD screens (associated planning application: 25/03876/ADV).
Reference
25/03875/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW9 0XZ
Ward
Council
Received
15 Dec 2025
Validated
15 Jan 2026
Target date
12 Mar 2026
Decision date
12 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
25/03875/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW9 0XZ
Ward
Council
Received
15 Dec 2025
Validated
15 Jan 2026
Target date
12 Mar 2026
Decision date
12 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 12 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Paul Curtis — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
15 Dec 2025
Application received
15 Jan 2026
Application validated
12 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
12 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Paul Curtis
Appeal
Appeal lodged
15 Dec 2025
Application received
15 Jan 2026
Application validated
12 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
12 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Paul Curtis
Appeal
Appeal lodged
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed BT Street Hub with integrated digital advertising screens by reason of its scale and location
would introduce an incongruous form of advertising, one that would appear overly dominant and one which adds
visual clutter to this part of Stockwell Road and failing to respond positively to the character and appearance of the
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk
London planning@lambeth.gov.uk
SW2 9QQ
REFULZ
street scene. As a result, the scheme is considered to be contrary with the aims and objectives of Policies Q2, Q5,
Q6, Q17 and T9 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
2
The proposed BT Street Hub with integrated digital advertising screens and emergency functionality, would
introduce additional paraphernalia and street clutter, which would pose a threat to the functioning of the pavement
and the safety of pedestrians using this part of Stockwell Road. Furthermore, by virtue of the hub's design, any
members of the public using the facilities would occupy the pavement area, further reducing the amount of
pavement space available, resulting in additional, unacceptable obstruction to safe and comfortable pedestrian
movement. As a result, the scheme is considered to be contrary with the aims and objectives of Policies Q17, T1,
T2, T3 and T9 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and T4 of the London Plan (2021).
3
The proposed BT Street Hub with integrated digital advertising screens and emergency functionality, by
reason of its inappropriate siting and design, would fail to reduce opportunities for crime and anti-social behaviour
to the detriment of community safety and security, and those using the hub and its functions. As a result, the
scheme is considered contrary to the aims and objectives of policy Q3 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
1
The proposed BT Street Hub with integrated digital advertising screens by reason of its scale and location
would introduce an incongruous form of advertising, one that would appear overly dominant and one which adds
visual clutter to this part of Stockwell Road and failing to respond positively to the character and appearance of the
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk
London planning@lambeth.gov.uk
SW2 9QQ
REFULZ
street scene. As a result, the scheme is considered to be contrary with the aims and objectives of Policies Q2, Q5,
Q6, Q17 and T9 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
2
The proposed BT Street Hub with integrated digital advertising screens and emergency functionality, would
introduce additional paraphernalia and street clutter, which would pose a threat to the functioning of the pavement
and the safety of pedestrians using this part of Stockwell Road. Furthermore, by virtue of the hub's design, any
members of the public using the facilities would occupy the pavement area, further reducing the amount of
pavement space available, resulting in additional, unacceptable obstruction to safe and comfortable pedestrian
movement. As a result, the scheme is considered to be contrary with the aims and objectives of Policies Q17, T1,
T2, T3 and T9 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and T4 of the London Plan (2021).
3
The proposed BT Street Hub with integrated digital advertising screens and emergency functionality, by
reason of its inappropriate siting and design, would fail to reduce opportunities for crime and anti-social behaviour
to the detriment of community safety and security, and those using the hub and its functions. As a result, the
scheme is considered contrary to the aims and objectives of policy Q3 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
Policies cited
Q2Q5Q6Q17T9T1T2T3T4Q3
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal lodged
Outcome not yet recorded
Appeal lodged
Outcome not yet recorded
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.