Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethStockwell East ward25/03883/FUL
Planning application · Lambeth

25/03883/FUL.

Footway Adjacent To Hillyard House, Brixton Road London SW9 0NH

Full / Other Planning at Footway Adjacent To Hillyard House, Brixton Road London SW9 0NH, received 15 Dec 2025 — refused on 16 Mar 2026 (delegated, Nadia Harper).

LambethStockwell EastSW9 0NH25/03883/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Mar 2026
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal lodged
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

The application seeks full planning permission for the replacement of an existing kiosk, together with the installation of 1x BT Street Hub (Please note: The reference number for this application for Advertisement Consent is 25/03884/ADV, but there is also an associated application for Full Planning Permission related to these works with reference number: 25/03883/FUL).

Reference
25/03883/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW9 0NH
Council
Received
15 Dec 2025
Validated
2 Jan 2026
Target date
27 Feb 2026
Decision date
16 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
25/03883/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW9 0NH
Council
Received
15 Dec 2025
Validated
2 Jan 2026
Target date
27 Feb 2026
Decision date
16 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
16 Mar 2026
Delegated Register
16 Mar 2026
STREET HUBS BEYOND CONNECTION
15 Dec 2025
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
15 Dec 2025
DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY
15 Dec 2025
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
15 Dec 2025
PLANNING STATEMENT
15 Dec 2025
LIGHTING GUIDE
15 Dec 2025
OS MAP AND THE LOCATION PLAN
15 Dec 2025
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
15 Dec 2025
Decision Notice
16 Mar 2026
Delegated Register
16 Mar 2026
STREET HUBS BEYOND CONNECTION
15 Dec 2025
Show all 10 rows
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
15 Dec 2025
DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY
15 Dec 2025
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
15 Dec 2025
PLANNING STATEMENT
15 Dec 2025
LIGHTING GUIDE
15 Dec 2025
OS MAP AND THE LOCATION PLAN
15 Dec 2025
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
15 Dec 2025

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 16 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Nadia Harper — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Dec 2025
Application received
2 Jan 2026
Application validated
27 Feb 2026
Statutory target date
16 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Nadia Harper
Appeal
Appeal lodged
15 Dec 2025
Application received
2 Jan 2026
Application validated
27 Feb 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
16 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Nadia Harper
Appeal
Appeal lodged

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed Street Hub with advertisements would not sustain or reinforce local distinctiveness, would fail to provide a contextual design response, and would not integrate with the established character of the area. They would contribute to unacceptable visual clutter to the detriment of nearby heritage assets and the public realm. In this case, the removal of two kiosks does not outweigh the identified harm arising from the introduction of a digital advertisement unit at this sensitive location. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies T9, Q5, Q6, Q17, Q20, and Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2021.
2
The proposed Street Hub, by reason of its siting adjacent to a busy section of Brixton Road and immediately beside a bus and cycle lane, would introduce a distracting visual element that would compromise highway safety. It would also introduce unnecessary street furniture, resulting in additional street clutter and an obstruction on the footway, harming the quality and accessibility of the public realm, including for visually impaired people. The proposal is therefore contrary to London Plan Policies T4, D8 and D3, as well as the Mayor's Vision Zero objectives and TfL's Streetscape Guidance.
1
The proposed Street Hub with advertisements would not sustain or reinforce local distinctiveness, would fail to provide a contextual design response, and would not integrate with the established character of the area. They would contribute to unacceptable visual clutter to the detriment of nearby heritage assets and the public realm. In this case, the removal of two kiosks does not outweigh the identified harm arising from the introduction of a digital advertisement unit at this sensitive location. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies T9, Q5, Q6, Q17, Q20, and Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2021.
2
The proposed Street Hub, by reason of its siting adjacent to a busy section of Brixton Road and immediately beside a bus and cycle lane, would introduce a distracting visual element that would compromise highway safety. It would also introduce unnecessary street furniture, resulting in additional street clutter and an obstruction on the footway, harming the quality and accessibility of the public realm, including for visually impaired people. The proposal is therefore contrary to London Plan Policies T4, D8 and D3, as well as the Mayor's Vision Zero objectives and TfL's Streetscape Guidance.
Policies cited
Q22T4D8D3

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal lodged
Outcome not yet recorded
Appeal lodged
Outcome not yet recorded

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.