Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethKennington ward26/00142/LB
Planning application · Lambeth

26/00142/LB.

367 Kennington Road London SE11 4PT

Listed Building at 367 Kennington Road London SE11 4PT, received 16 Jan 2026 — refused on 11 May 2026 (delegated, Joanne Broadbent).

LambethKenningtonSE11 4PT26/00142/LB
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 May 2026
16 wks
Decision time
8 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
38
Documents
38 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Application for Listed Building Consent for the change of use from Office (Use Class E) to a mixed-use development comprising a Gym (Use Class E) and residential accommodation (Use Class C3), including the creation of 1 x 2 bed and 1 x 3 bed residential units within the north and south wings, together with associated internal and external alterations and the provision of refuse and cycle storage - Full Planning Permission ref: 26/00141/FUL received.

Reference
26/00142/LB
Type
Listed Building Consent
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
SE11 4PT
Council
Received
16 Jan 2026
Target date
12 May 2026
Decision date
11 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/00142/LB
Type
Listed Building Consent
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
SE11 4PT
Council
Received
16 Jan 2026
Target date
12 May 2026
Decision date
11 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
11 May 2026
OFFICER REPORT
8 May 2026
HERITAGE STATEMENT
7 May 2026
Photo
12 Mar 2026
LEVEL 1 EXISTING
12 Mar 2026
Photo
12 Mar 2026
LEVEL 1 PROPOSED MIXED USE
12 Mar 2026
DEMOLITION LOWER GROUND FLOOR
16 Jan 2026
DEMOLITION RAISED GROUND FLOOR
16 Jan 2026
PLANNING STATEMENT
16 Jan 2026
Decision Notice
11 May 2026
OFFICER REPORT
8 May 2026
HERITAGE STATEMENT
7 May 2026
Show all 10 rows
Photo
12 Mar 2026
LEVEL 1 EXISTING
12 Mar 2026
Photo
12 Mar 2026
LEVEL 1 PROPOSED MIXED USE
12 Mar 2026
DEMOLITION LOWER GROUND FLOOR
16 Jan 2026
DEMOLITION RAISED GROUND FLOOR
16 Jan 2026
PLANNING STATEMENT
16 Jan 2026

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 11 May 2026, delegated decision by Joanne Broadbent — 16 weeks from submission (8 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
16 Jan 2026
Application received
12 May 2026
Statutory target date
11 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Joanne Broadbent
16 Jan 2026
Application received
12 May 2026
Statutory target date
11 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Joanne Broadbent

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed works, including the introduction of a lift and staircase to basement and first floor levels within the main hall, the proposed subdivision of room 6, and the extension of the existing store at ground floor level, would result in less than substantial harm to the special interest of the Grade II listed building, as a result of alterations to the historic plan form and loss of historic fabric and the incongruous appearance of the ground floor extension. A clear and convincing justification has not been provided for this harm, contrary to paragraph 213 of the NPPF (2024). In addition, insufficient information has been provided to establish whether the introduction of the gym; including any required service runs and plant equipment; the introduction new openings and subdivision of the mezzanine floor would cause further harm to the special interest of the Grade II listed building. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy Q20 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021). Insufficient heritage or public benefits would be delivered to outweigh the harm identified, nor is there sufficient evidence that the proposed development would secure its optimum viable use, contrary to Paragraph 215 of the NPPF (2024).
1
The proposed works, including the introduction of a lift and staircase to basement and first floor levels within the main hall, the proposed subdivision of room 6, and the extension of the existing store at ground floor level, would result in less than substantial harm to the special interest of the Grade II listed building, as a result of alterations to the historic plan form and loss of historic fabric and the incongruous appearance of the ground floor extension. A clear and convincing justification has not been provided for this harm, contrary to paragraph 213 of the NPPF (2024). In addition, insufficient information has been provided to establish whether the introduction of the gym; including any required service runs and plant equipment; the introduction new openings and subdivision of the mezzanine floor would cause further harm to the special interest of the Grade II listed building. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy Q20 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021). Insufficient heritage or public benefits would be delivered to outweigh the harm identified, nor is there sufficient evidence that the proposed development would secure its optimum viable use, contrary to Paragraph 215 of the NPPF (2024).
Policies cited
Q20NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.