Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethHerne Hill Loughborough Junction ward26/00798/FUL
Planning application · Lambeth

26/00798/FUL.

39-41 Coldharbour Lane London Lambeth SE5 9NR

Full / Other Planning at 39-41 Coldharbour Lane London Lambeth SE5 9NR, received 12 Mar 2026 — refused on 21 May 2026 (delegated, Camilla Bebb).

LambethHerne Hill Loughborough JunctionSE5 9NR26/00798/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
21 May 2026
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Increase in height of the roof to the rear single storey building and erection of ventilation duct above the roof to serve ventilation system proposed internally within the roof.

Reference
26/00798/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE5 9NR
Council
Received
12 Mar 2026
Target date
21 May 2026
Decision date
21 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/00798/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE5 9NR
Council
Received
12 Mar 2026
Target date
21 May 2026
Decision date
21 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
21 May 2026
OFFICER REPORT
20 May 2026
EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATION
27 Apr 2026
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
12 Mar 2026
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN
12 Mar 2026
COVERING LETTER
12 Mar 2026
ODOUR ASSESSMENT
12 Mar 2026
OS MAP AND BLOCK PLAN
12 Mar 2026
PLANNING STATEMENT
12 Mar 2026
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
12 Mar 2026
Decision Notice
21 May 2026
OFFICER REPORT
20 May 2026
EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATION
27 Apr 2026
Show all 10 rows
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
12 Mar 2026
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN
12 Mar 2026
COVERING LETTER
12 Mar 2026
ODOUR ASSESSMENT
12 Mar 2026
OS MAP AND BLOCK PLAN
12 Mar 2026
PLANNING STATEMENT
12 Mar 2026
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
12 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 21 May 2026, delegated decision by Camilla Bebb — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
12 Mar 2026
Application received
21 May 2026
Statutory target date
21 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Camilla Bebb
12 Mar 2026
Application received
21 May 2026
Statutory target date
21 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Camilla Bebb

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The submitted plans are inaccurate and inconsistent and fail to clearly illustrate the proposed development. The lack of clarity, together with discrepancies between the plans and the description of development, means the Local Planning Authority is unable to properly assess the proposal or its impacts. As such, the proposal fails to provide sufficient information to enable a full and proper assessment and is contrary to the principles of good decision-making as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework, including Paragraph 55, which requires applications to be determined on the basis of adequate information.
1
The submitted plans are inaccurate and inconsistent and fail to clearly illustrate the proposed development. The lack of clarity, together with discrepancies between the plans and the description of development, means the Local Planning Authority is unable to properly assess the proposal or its impacts. As such, the proposal fails to provide sufficient information to enable a full and proper assessment and is contrary to the principles of good decision-making as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework, including Paragraph 55, which requires applications to be determined on the basis of adequate information.
Policies cited
NPPF para 55

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.