Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethWaterloo & South Bank ward26/00879/FUL
Planning application · Lambeth

26/00879/FUL.

23 Pearman Street London SE1 7RB

Full / Other Planning at 23 Pearman Street London SE1 7RB, received 18 Mar 2026 — refused on 3 Jun 2026 (delegated, Dominic Harris).

LambethWaterloo & South BankSE1 7RB26/00879/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Jun 2026
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
3
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use from dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) to a 9-person HMO (sui generis) and associated works.

Reference
26/00879/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE1 7RB
Council
Received
18 Mar 2026
Validated
30 Mar 2026
Target date
3 Jun 2026
Decision date
3 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/00879/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE1 7RB
Council
Received
18 Mar 2026
Validated
30 Mar 2026
Target date
3 Jun 2026
Decision date
3 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
3 Jun 2026
Delegated Register
3 Jun 2026
FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT
17 Apr 2026
ELEVATIONS (EXISTING + PROPOSED)
19 Mar 2026
PLANS (PROPOSED)
19 Mar 2026
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
19 Mar 2026
PLANS (EXISTING)
19 Mar 2026
SECTION A1?A1 (EXISTING)
19 Mar 2026
SECTION A1-A1 (PROPOSED)
19 Mar 2026
THE LOCATION PLAN
19 Mar 2026
Decision Notice
3 Jun 2026
Delegated Register
3 Jun 2026
FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT
17 Apr 2026
Show all 10 rows
ELEVATIONS (EXISTING + PROPOSED)
19 Mar 2026
PLANS (PROPOSED)
19 Mar 2026
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
19 Mar 2026
PLANS (EXISTING)
19 Mar 2026
SECTION A1?A1 (EXISTING)
19 Mar 2026
SECTION A1-A1 (PROPOSED)
19 Mar 2026
THE LOCATION PLAN
19 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 3 Jun 2026, delegated decision by Dominic Harris — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Mar 2026
Application received
30 Mar 2026
Application validated
3 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
3 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Dominic Harris
18 Mar 2026
Application received
30 Mar 2026
Application validated
3 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
3 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Dominic Harris

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed change of use of the existing dwelling to a nine-person HMO fails to demonstrate that the proposal would meet an identified local need. The application additionally fails to demonstrate compliance with the requirement for a financial contribution towards affordable housing in respect of a large HMO intended as general needs housing for single people. The proposed development is therefore contrary to Policies H4 and H8 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies H2, H3 and H9 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
2
In the absence of details demonstrating that adequate waste and recycling storage can be provided on-site Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk London planning@lambeth.gov.uk SW2 9QQ REFULZ in a safe and accessible location that does not cause harm to amenity, the proposed development fails to demonstrate compliance with the Council's waste storage requirements. As such, it would be contrary to Policies Q2, Q5 and Q12 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
3
The application does not include a legal mechanism to deliver planning obligations for securing: (i) the use to be parking permit free; and (ii) a contribution to a hangar to provide on-street cycle parking. The development would therefore not promote sustainable modes of travel, and the transport impacts of the development would not be mitigated. This is contrary to Policies T4, T5 and T6 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies D4, T3 and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
1
The proposed change of use of the existing dwelling to a nine-person HMO fails to demonstrate that the proposal would meet an identified local need. The application additionally fails to demonstrate compliance with the requirement for a financial contribution towards affordable housing in respect of a large HMO intended as general needs housing for single people. The proposed development is therefore contrary to Policies H4 and H8 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies H2, H3 and H9 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
2
In the absence of details demonstrating that adequate waste and recycling storage can be provided on-site Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk London planning@lambeth.gov.uk SW2 9QQ REFULZ in a safe and accessible location that does not cause harm to amenity, the proposed development fails to demonstrate compliance with the Council's waste storage requirements. As such, it would be contrary to Policies Q2, Q5 and Q12 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).
3
The application does not include a legal mechanism to deliver planning obligations for securing: (i) the use to be parking permit free; and (ii) a contribution to a hangar to provide on-street cycle parking. The development would therefore not promote sustainable modes of travel, and the transport impacts of the development would not be mitigated. This is contrary to Policies T4, T5 and T6 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies D4, T3 and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).
Policies cited
H4H8H2H3H9Q2Q5Q12T4T5T6D4T3

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.