Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethBrixton Windrush ward26/00919/FUL
Planning application · Lambeth

26/00919/FUL.

91 Railton Road London SE24 0LR

Full / Other Planning at 91 Railton Road London SE24 0LR, received 23 Mar 2026 — refused on 13 May 2026 (delegated, Camilla Bebb).

LambethBrixton WindrushSE24 0LR26/00919/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 May 2026
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a L shaped rear dormer including 3 roof lights to the front elevation (Flat B).

Reference
26/00919/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE24 0LR
Council
Received
23 Mar 2026
Target date
18 May 2026
Decision date
13 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/00919/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE24 0LR
Council
Received
23 Mar 2026
Target date
18 May 2026
Decision date
13 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
OFFICER REPORT
13 May 2026
Decision Notice
13 May 2026
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
23 Mar 2026
OS MAP
23 Mar 2026
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
23 Mar 2026
EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
23 Mar 2026
OFFICER REPORT
13 May 2026
Decision Notice
13 May 2026
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
23 Mar 2026
Show all 6 rows
OS MAP
23 Mar 2026
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
23 Mar 2026
EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
23 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 13 May 2026, delegated decision by Camilla Bebb — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Mar 2026
Application received
18 May 2026
Statutory target date
13 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Camilla Bebb
23 Mar 2026
Application received
18 May 2026
Statutory target date
13 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Camilla Bebb

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed L shaped rear dormer, by reason of its excessive scale, bulk and form extending across both rear roof slopes, would result in a visually intrusive and overly dominant addition that fails to remain subordinate to the host building. The development would erode the legibility of the original roof form and cause harm to the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding roofscape. The proposal is thereby contrary to the Lambeth Design Guide (2023) and policies Q5 and Q11 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021). Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk London planning@lambeth.gov.uk SW2 9QQ REFULZ
1
The proposed L shaped rear dormer, by reason of its excessive scale, bulk and form extending across both rear roof slopes, would result in a visually intrusive and overly dominant addition that fails to remain subordinate to the host building. The development would erode the legibility of the original roof form and cause harm to the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding roofscape. The proposal is thereby contrary to the Lambeth Design Guide (2023) and policies Q5 and Q11 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021). Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk London planning@lambeth.gov.uk SW2 9QQ REFULZ
Policies cited
Q5Q11

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.