Planning application · Lambeth
26/00933/FUL.
1 Tudor Close Brixton Hill London Lambeth SW2 2AA
Full / Other Planning at 1 Tudor Close Brixton Hill London Lambeth SW2 2AA, received 23 Mar 2026 — refused on 22 May 2026 (delegated, Felicia Onabanjo).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
22 May 2026
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Replacement of rooftop handrail with new balustrade handrail.
Reference
26/00933/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW2 2AA
Council
Received
23 Mar 2026
Validated
30 Mar 2026
Target date
25 May 2026
Decision date
22 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
26/00933/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW2 2AA
Council
Received
23 Mar 2026
Validated
30 Mar 2026
Target date
25 May 2026
Decision date
22 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 22 May 2026, delegated decision by Felicia Onabanjo — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
23 Mar 2026
Application received
30 Mar 2026
Application validated
25 May 2026
Statutory target date
22 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Felicia Onabanjo
23 Mar 2026
Application received
30 Mar 2026
Application validated
25 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
22 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Felicia Onabanjo
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed balustrade by reason of its design, layout and siting would prejudice the optimum future
development at the neighbouring properties of nos. 2-8 Elm Park because the scheme unacceptably facilitates the
enlargement of the available area over the flat roof at the end of the north eastern block of 1 Tudor Close, Brixton
Hill that could be used for recreational purposes. The proposal is thereby contrary to Policy Q7 of the Lambeth
Local Plan 2021.
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk
London planning@lambeth.gov.uk
SW2 9QQ
REFULZ
2
The proposed balustrade by reason of its design, layout and siting would facilitate the enlargement of the
area over flat roof toward the end of the block that could be used for recreational purposes and thus would have a
significantly unacceptable impact on amenity in terms of privacy, outlook, overlooking, noise and disturbance and
an overbearing impact for occupants of nos. 2-8 Elm Park. The proposal is thereby contrary to Policy Q2 of the
Lambeth Local Plan 2021 and D14 of the London Plan (2021).
1
The proposed balustrade by reason of its design, layout and siting would prejudice the optimum future
development at the neighbouring properties of nos. 2-8 Elm Park because the scheme unacceptably facilitates the
enlargement of the available area over the flat roof at the end of the north eastern block of 1 Tudor Close, Brixton
Hill that could be used for recreational purposes. The proposal is thereby contrary to Policy Q7 of the Lambeth
Local Plan 2021.
Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180
PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk
London planning@lambeth.gov.uk
SW2 9QQ
REFULZ
2
The proposed balustrade by reason of its design, layout and siting would facilitate the enlargement of the
area over flat roof toward the end of the block that could be used for recreational purposes and thus would have a
significantly unacceptable impact on amenity in terms of privacy, outlook, overlooking, noise and disturbance and
an overbearing impact for occupants of nos. 2-8 Elm Park. The proposal is thereby contrary to Policy Q2 of the
Lambeth Local Plan 2021 and D14 of the London Plan (2021).
Policies cited
Q7Q2D14
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.