Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethBrixton Rush Common ward26/00937/FUL
Planning application · Lambeth

26/00937/FUL.

2 Arodene Road London SW2 2BH

Full / Other Planning at 2 Arodene Road London SW2 2BH, received 24 Mar 2026 — refused on 27 May 2026 (delegated, Camilla Bebb).

LambethBrixton Rush CommonSW2 2BH26/00937/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 May 2026
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Removal of the existing garage and erection of two storey side extension with loft space to create a new garage and storage/office room, including lowering the floor.

Reference
26/00937/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW2 2BH
Council
Received
24 Mar 2026
Validated
1 Apr 2026
Target date
27 May 2026
Decision date
27 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/00937/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW2 2BH
Council
Received
24 Mar 2026
Validated
1 Apr 2026
Target date
27 May 2026
Decision date
27 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
27 May 2026
OFFICER REPORT
27 May 2026
REDATED
15 Apr 2026
HERITAGE STATEMENT
9 Apr 2026
PROPOSED DRAWINGS
9 Apr 2026
THE LOCATION PLAN
24 Mar 2026
LOCATION AND BLOCK PLANS
24 Mar 2026
EXISTING DRAWINGS
24 Mar 2026
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
24 Mar 2026
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
24 Mar 2026
Decision Notice
27 May 2026
OFFICER REPORT
27 May 2026
REDATED
15 Apr 2026
Show all 10 rows
HERITAGE STATEMENT
9 Apr 2026
PROPOSED DRAWINGS
9 Apr 2026
THE LOCATION PLAN
24 Mar 2026
LOCATION AND BLOCK PLANS
24 Mar 2026
EXISTING DRAWINGS
24 Mar 2026
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
24 Mar 2026
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
24 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 27 May 2026, delegated decision by Camilla Bebb — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
24 Mar 2026
Application received
1 Apr 2026
Application validated
27 May 2026
Statutory target date
27 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Camilla Bebb
24 Mar 2026
Application received
1 Apr 2026
Application validated
27 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Camilla Bebb

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its design, scale, siting and forward projection beyond the established building line, would appear over-dominant and disrupt the character and rhythm of the terrace. It would result in less than substantial harm to the significance of the Rush Common Brixton Hill Conservation Area, which is not outweighed by any public benefits. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies Q5, Q11 and Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan and the advice contained within the NPPF. Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk London planning@lambeth.gov.uk SW2 9QQ REFULZ
1
The proposed development, by reason of its design, scale, siting and forward projection beyond the established building line, would appear over-dominant and disrupt the character and rhythm of the terrace. It would result in less than substantial harm to the significance of the Rush Common Brixton Hill Conservation Area, which is not outweighed by any public benefits. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies Q5, Q11 and Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan and the advice contained within the NPPF. Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk London planning@lambeth.gov.uk SW2 9QQ REFULZ
Policies cited
Q5Q11Q22NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.