Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLambethStreatham Wells ward97/00602/CON
Planning application · Lambeth

97/00602/CON.

Uplands 254 Leigham Court Road London SW16 2QH

Listed Building at Uplands 254 Leigham Court Road London SW16 2QH, received 3 Apr 1997 — withdrawn on 2 Jul 1997 by committee.

LambethStreatham WellsSW16 2QH97/00602/CON
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
2 Jul 1997
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of both wings of Uplands House and part of boundary wall.

Reference
97/00602/CON
Type
Conservation Area Consent (demolition)
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
SW16 2QH
Council
Received
3 Apr 1997
Target date
29 May 1997
Decision date
2 Jul 1997
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Withdrawn
Reference
97/00602/CON
Type
Conservation Area Consent (demolition)
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
SW16 2QH
Council
Received
3 Apr 1997
Target date
29 May 1997
Decision date
2 Jul 1997
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Withdrawn
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 2 Jul 1997, determined by the planning committee — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Apr 1997
Application received
29 May 1997
Statutory target date
2 Jul 1997
Committee decision: Withdrawn
3 Apr 1997
Application received
29 May 1997
Statutory target date
2 Jul 1997
Committee decision: Withdrawn

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.