Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Lambeth›…Herne Hill ward20 Acland Crescent London SE5 8EQ›99/00452/FUL
Planning application · Lambeth

99/00452/FUL.

20 Acland Crescent London SE5 8EQ

Full / Other Planning at 20 Acland Crescent London SE5 8EQ, received 5 Mar 1999 — withdrawn on 7 Feb 2001.

Lambeth›Herne Hill›SE5 8EQ›99/00452/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLambeth profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
7 Feb 2001
101 wks
Decision time
93 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lambeth planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of two storey side extension.

Reference
99/00452/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
SE5 8EQ
Ward
Council
Received
5 Mar 1999
Target date
30 Apr 1999
Decision date
7 Feb 2001
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Premises record
Council register
Reference
99/00452/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
SE5 8EQ
Ward
Council
Received
5 Mar 1999
Target date
30 Apr 1999
Decision date
7 Feb 2001
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Lambeth portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 7 Feb 2001 — 101 weeks from submission (93 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Mar 1999
Application received
30 Apr 1999
Statutory target date
7 Feb 2001
Delegated decision: Withdrawn
5 Mar 1999
Application received
30 Apr 1999
Statutory target date
7 Feb 2001
Delegated decision: Withdrawn

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.