Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Snaresbrook. ward›0056/06
Planning application · Redbridge

0056/06.

Corporation Yard, Wanstead Place, Wanstead.

Full / Other Planning at Corporation Yard, Wanstead Place, Wanstead., received 9 Jan 2006 — approved on 31 Jan 2006 (delegated, X Tom Forkan (inactive)B).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
31 Jan 2006
3 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
3
Documents
3 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

AMENDMENT TO APP NO 2646/01: Changes to railing and handrail around first floor front deck.

Reference
0056/06
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
9 Jan 2006
Target date
6 Mar 2006
Decision date
31 Jan 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Council register
Reference
0056/06
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
9 Jan 2006
Target date
6 Mar 2006
Decision date
31 Jan 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
AMENDMENT TO 2646/01
1 Jul 2009
Decision notice
1 Jul 2009
PLAN VIEW & ELEVATIONS
1 Jul 2009
AMENDMENT TO 2646/01
1 Jul 2009
Decision notice
1 Jul 2009
PLAN VIEW & ELEVATIONS
1 Jul 2009

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 31 Jan 2006, delegated decision by X Tom Forkan (inactive)B — 3 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
9 Jan 2006
Application received
6 Mar 2006
Statutory target date
31 Jan 2006
Delegated decision: Approved · X Tom Forkan (inactive)B
9 Jan 2006
Application received
6 Mar 2006
Statutory target date
31 Jan 2006
Delegated decision: Approved · X Tom Forkan (inactive)B

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.