Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Loxford. wardSite Of Telecommunications Mast Adjacent 287, Ilford Lane, Ilford›0097/15
Planning application · Redbridge

0097/15.

Site Of Telecommunications Mast Adjacent 287, Ilford Lane, Ilford

Prior Approval at Site Of Telecommunications Mast Adjacent 287, Ilford Lane, Ilford, received 12 Jan 2015 — refused on 6 Mar 2015 (delegated, X V. Olonisaye-Collins).

Redbridge›Loxford.›0097/15
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Refused
Outcome
6 Mar 2015
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
Yes
Appeal
Allowed
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of 12m high telecommunication monopole with 6 antennas and associated equipment (Summary).

Reference
0097/15
Type
Prior Approval Determination
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
12 Jan 2015
Target date
8 Mar 2015
Decision date
6 Mar 2015
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
0097/15
Type
Prior Approval Determination
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
12 Jan 2015
Target date
8 Mar 2015
Decision date
6 Mar 2015
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 6 Mar 2015, delegated decision by X V. Olonisaye-Collins — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
12 Jan 2015
Application received
8 Mar 2015
Statutory target date
6 Mar 2015
Delegated decision: Refused · X V. Olonisaye-Collins
Appeal
Written Representations · Allowed
12 Jan 2015
Application received
8 Mar 2015
Statutory target date
6 Mar 2015
Delegated decision: Refused · X V. Olonisaye-Collins
Show all 4 rows
Appeal
Written Representations · Allowed

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Written Representations
Outcome: Allowed
Written Representations
Outcome: Allowed

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.