Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Hainault. ward›0223/13
Planning application · Redbridge

0223/13.

Former Garage Block Rear Of 25 To 31, Yellowpine Way, Chigwell

Other at Former Garage Block Rear Of 25 To 31, Yellowpine Way, Chigwell, received 1 Feb 2013 — approved on 16 Jan 2014 by committee.

Redbridge›Hainault.›0223/13
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
16 Jan 2014
50 wks
Decision time
42 wks over the 8-week target
11
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Variation of (Condition 2) of approved Planning Permission 2106/10: Alteration to door and window types.

Reference
0223/13
Type
Other
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
1 Feb 2013
Validated
6 Feb 2013
Target date
2 Apr 2013
Decision date
16 Jan 2014
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Despatched
Council register
Reference
0223/13
Type
Other
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
1 Feb 2013
Validated
6 Feb 2013
Target date
2 Apr 2013
Decision date
16 Jan 2014
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Despatched
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 16 Jan 2014, determined by the planning committee — 50 weeks from submission (42 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Feb 2013
Application received
6 Feb 2013
Application validated
2 Apr 2013
Statutory target date
16 Jan 2014
Committee decision: Approved
1 Feb 2013
Application received
6 Feb 2013
Application validated
2 Apr 2013
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
16 Jan 2014
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.