Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Hainault. ward›0734/01F
Planning application · Redbridge

0734/01F.

Land at Five Oaks Lane, Chigwell.

Full / Other Planning at Land at Five Oaks Lane, Chigwell., received 18 Jun 2003 — approved on 19 Dec 2003 (delegated, X Anna Van Heerden).

Redbridge›Hainault.›0734/01F
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
19 Dec 2003
26 wks
Decision time
18 wks over the 8-week target
1
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Hard and soft landscaping works:(Condition 17 (part) ). DETAILS FOLLOWING RESERVED MATTERS

Reference
0734/01F
Type
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
18 Jun 2003
Validated
20 Jun 2003
Target date
15 Aug 2003
Decision date
19 Dec 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Reference
0734/01F
Type
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
18 Jun 2003
Validated
20 Jun 2003
Target date
15 Aug 2003
Decision date
19 Dec 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 19 Dec 2003, delegated decision by X Anna Van Heerden — 26 weeks from submission (18 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Jun 2003
Application received
20 Jun 2003
Application validated
15 Aug 2003
Statutory target date
19 Dec 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · X Anna Van Heerden
18 Jun 2003
Application received
20 Jun 2003
Application validated
15 Aug 2003
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
19 Dec 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · X Anna Van Heerden

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.