Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Clayhall ward›1033/22
Planning application · Redbridge

1033/22.

Telecommunication Installation At Land East Side Of, Grangeway Gardens, Ilford

Prior Approval at Telecommunication Installation At Land East Side Of, Grangeway Gardens, Ilford, received 24 Mar 2022 — refused on 19 May 2022.

Redbridge›Clayhall›1033/22
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Refused
Outcome
19 May 2022
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Telecommunications - Removal of garage and installation of 17m high monopole fea

Reference
1033/22
Type
Prior Approval Determination
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Ward
Council
Received
24 Mar 2022
Validated
5 Apr 2022
Target date
19 May 2022
Decision date
19 May 2022
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
1033/22
Type
Prior Approval Determination
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Ward
Council
Received
24 Mar 2022
Validated
5 Apr 2022
Target date
19 May 2022
Decision date
19 May 2022
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 19 May 2022 — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
24 Mar 2022
Application received
5 Apr 2022
Application validated
19 May 2022
Statutory target date
19 May 2022
Delegated decision: Refused
24 Mar 2022
Application received
5 Apr 2022
Application validated
19 May 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
19 May 2022
Delegated decision: Refused

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.