Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeNewbury. wardIG2 7EL102, Stainforth Road, Newbury Park.1179/99
Planning application · Redbridge

1179/99.

102, Stainforth Road, Newbury Park.

Full / Other Planning at 102, Stainforth Road, Newbury Park., received 27 Jul 1999 — refused on 29 Feb 2000 (delegated, Patricia Charleton).

RedbridgeNewbury.IG2 7EL1179/99
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Feb 2000
31 wks
Decision time
23 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Rear extension, detached garage with canopy and loft conversion.

Reference
1179/99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
27 Jul 1999
Validated
28 Jul 1999
Target date
22 Sep 1999
Decision date
29 Feb 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Made
Reference
1179/99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
27 Jul 1999
Validated
28 Jul 1999
Target date
22 Sep 1999
Decision date
29 Feb 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Made
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 29 Feb 2000, delegated decision by Patricia Charleton — 31 weeks from submission (23 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
27 Jul 1999
Application received
28 Jul 1999
Application validated
22 Sep 1999
Statutory target date
29 Feb 2000
Delegated decision: Refused · Patricia Charleton
27 Jul 1999
Application received
28 Jul 1999
Application validated
22 Sep 1999
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
29 Feb 2000
Delegated decision: Refused · Patricia Charleton

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.