Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Seven Kings ward›1220/20
Planning application · Redbridge

1220/20.

Development Site At 35, Barley Lane, Ilford

Full / Other Planning at Development Site At 35, Barley Lane, Ilford, received 22 Apr 2020 — approved on 28 Jul 2020 (delegated, X Curtis Thompson).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
28 Jul 2020
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
15
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolish bungalow. Erection of three storey building to contain six self-contai

Reference
1220/20
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
22 Apr 2020
Validated
27 Apr 2020
Target date
17 Jun 2020
Decision date
28 Jul 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
1220/20
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
22 Apr 2020
Validated
27 Apr 2020
Target date
17 Jun 2020
Decision date
28 Jul 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 28 Jul 2020, delegated decision by X Curtis Thompson — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
22 Apr 2020
Application received
27 Apr 2020
Application validated
17 Jun 2020
Statutory target date
28 Jul 2020
Delegated decision: Approved · X Curtis Thompson
22 Apr 2020
Application received
27 Apr 2020
Application validated
17 Jun 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
28 Jul 2020
Delegated decision: Approved · X Curtis Thompson

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.