Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›…Loxford ward›1465/23
Planning application · Redbridge

1465/23.

Development At 23b, Uphall Road, Ilford

Full / Other Planning at Development At 23b, Uphall Road, Ilford, received 22 May 2023 — refused on 1 Aug 2023 (delegated, Bethany McCay).

Redbridge›Loxford›1465/23
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Aug 2023
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
8
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolish existing structure. New one bedroom house with associated amenity space, cycle and refuse storage. (Summary)

Reference
1465/23
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
22 May 2023
Validated
8 Jun 2023
Target date
1 Aug 2023
Decision date
1 Aug 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal Decided
Council register
Reference
1465/23
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
22 May 2023
Validated
8 Jun 2023
Target date
1 Aug 2023
Decision date
1 Aug 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 1 Aug 2023, delegated decision by Bethany McCay — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
22 May 2023
Application received
8 Jun 2023
Application validated
1 Aug 2023
Statutory target date
1 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Bethany McCay
22 May 2023
Application received
8 Jun 2023
Application validated
1 Aug 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
1 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Bethany McCay

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.