Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeValentines ward29A and 29B, Airlie Gardens, Ilford1553/24
Planning application · Redbridge

1553/24.

29A and 29B, Airlie Gardens, Ilford

Full / Other Planning at 29A and 29B, Airlie Gardens, Ilford, received 5 Jun 2024 — approved on 5 Jul 2024 (delegated, Tom Weighton).

RedbridgeValentines1553/24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
5 Jul 2024
4 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Replacement windows to Flats A and B. (summary)

Reference
1553/24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
5 Jun 2024
Validated
7 Jun 2024
Target date
31 Jul 2024
Decision date
5 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Reference
1553/24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
5 Jun 2024
Validated
7 Jun 2024
Target date
31 Jul 2024
Decision date
5 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 5 Jul 2024, delegated decision by Tom Weighton — 4 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Jun 2024
Application received
7 Jun 2024
Application validated
31 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
5 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Approved · Tom Weighton
5 Jun 2024
Application received
7 Jun 2024
Application validated
31 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
5 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Approved · Tom Weighton

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.