Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeSeven Kings ward1616/23
Planning application · Redbridge

1616/23.

Development At 20 And 22, Ilfracombe Gardens, Chadwell Heath, Romford

Full / Other Planning at Development At 20 And 22, Ilfracombe Gardens, Chadwell Heath, Romford, received 6 Jun 2023 — refused on 8 Aug 2023 (delegated, X Ben Thompson).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Refused
Outcome
8 Aug 2023
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
8
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of 1x1 bedroom dwelling with associated waste/refuse, parking and amenity space. (Summary)

Reference
1616/23
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
6 Jun 2023
Validated
15 Jun 2023
Target date
8 Aug 2023
Decision date
8 Aug 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Reference
1616/23
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
6 Jun 2023
Validated
15 Jun 2023
Target date
8 Aug 2023
Decision date
8 Aug 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 8 Aug 2023, delegated decision by X Ben Thompson — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Jun 2023
Application received
15 Jun 2023
Application validated
8 Aug 2023
Statutory target date
8 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · X Ben Thompson
6 Jun 2023
Application received
15 Jun 2023
Application validated
8 Aug 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
8 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · X Ben Thompson

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.