Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRedbridgeHainault. ward1621/04
Planning application · Redbridge

1621/04.

Leinster Court, 484-494, New North Road, Hainault, Ilford, Essex

Full / Other Planning at Leinster Court, 484-494, New North Road, Hainault, Ilford, Essex, received 3 Jun 2004 — approved on 16 Feb 2005 (delegated, X Alan Romain).

RedbridgeHainault.1621/04
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRedbridge profile →
Approved
Outcome
16 Feb 2005
37 wks
Decision time
29 wks over the 8-week target
9
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Redbridge planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion of vacant space below block to provide 1 bed flat.

Reference
1621/04
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Council
Received
3 Jun 2004
Validated
7 Jun 2004
Target date
1 Aug 2004
Decision date
16 Feb 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Reference
1621/04
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Council
Received
3 Jun 2004
Validated
7 Jun 2004
Target date
1 Aug 2004
Decision date
16 Feb 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Despatched
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Redbridge portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 16 Feb 2005, delegated decision by X Alan Romain — 37 weeks from submission (29 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Jun 2004
Application received
7 Jun 2004
Application validated
1 Aug 2004
Statutory target date
16 Feb 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · X Alan Romain
3 Jun 2004
Application received
7 Jun 2004
Application validated
1 Aug 2004
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
16 Feb 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · X Alan Romain

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.